PureBasic Forums - English

@Josh,
+1

Josh wrote: ... Please take into account that other users also use a mobile phone or do not have English as their native language. Thanks.

Sorry Josh...I'm one of the guilty posters.

I really thought I was being thoughtful by organizing my posts into something that users would appreciate. Wow.. who knew that people would actually use their cellphones to read forum posts? Sounds like a nightmare to me, but then, I'm very 'old-school'.

I will take this into consideration in the future.

blueb wrote:I will take this into consideration in the future.

Thxs

A minority wants to dominate and rules
that only their (small) view is the right
way to show and to read text.
Very bad habit.

blueb wrote:who knew that people would actually use their cellphones to read forum posts?

I read the forum on the phone when I can't code... And yes, forcing like ends into me makes it less readable.

I also read the forum on my wide screen high res PC. I typically have it maximized, but when I want to read something as a reference while I'm coding, I might make the forum 20 to 30 percent of screen width... Another situation where forced width reduces readability.

Lord wrote:A minority wants to dominate and rules
that only their (small) view is the right
way to show and to read text.
Very bad habit.

Now you're really making a fool of yourself:

1) This has nothing to do with domination and regulation, it was a request.

2) I think your definition of minority is a little strange. I would assign the answers to this request:
Pro:

• Josh
• NicTheQuick
• #NULL
• demivec
• normeus
• djes
• davido
• blueb

Contra:

• lord

What's the minority here? Maybe you've lost the overview a bit because there are too many words next to each other for you in your browser.

3) The small view of things is rather on your side and that even in multiple wording:

• You're just referring to your little world, which obviously consists of a big screen and a browser in maximized display. Obviously, you don't know much about how to organize your screen and how a browser works.
• Probably you are still using a Nokia 3110 or similar as mobile phone, since you obviously have never used a browser on a mobile phone before.
• Maybe you havn't noticed in your limited world that English is only the mother tongue of a very small part of the world's population (about 5%).
• Since you obviously find it difficult to understand longer lines, it only shows that you have a very, very small view of things.

Lord wrote:You know why good books or newspapers put their
pages in columns? It increases readability immensely.
Lengthy lines are an imposition.

Yes, I know why, because it is not possible to change the width of a newspaper like a browser. Except for reference books, I don't know of any books with continuous text written in several columns. Here it is assumed that the reader can recognize connections that go beyond more than five words in a line. But maybe I haven't read a good book yet.

Josh wrote:How many foreign languages do you speak?

Your answer how many foreign languages you speak is still outstanding. But maybe that was already too many words in one line for you.

In the great era of NNTP forums (last century) it was recommended to cut the lines to 72 characters and users of flowed newsreaders were "flamed".

Now I always cut my codes to 80 characters (using the possible cuts in PB (, +)
I dream of a day when we would have " _" (space + underscore + CRLF) to make line breaks like in VB and AutoIt

For the text I also try to make short sentences.
- This facilitates automatic translation
- On a 20-inch full screen, it keeps my head from moving.

Lord wrote:A minority wants to dominate and rules
that only their (small) view is the right
way to show and to read text.
Very bad habit.

Did you attend troll school?

c
o
o
l

t
h
r
e
a
d

Isn't it possible to use terminal escape codes instead of HTML/BBCode ? Would be nice to recycle this old Esc[s
Esc[u doubtful knowledge.

@Josh:
In your contributions you manifest more and more your
egocentric point of view and it seems that you don't
want me to read your contributions because you still
write more characters in a row than is necessary for
good readability.

@Lord:
I don't know who is more egocentric now. Or, maybe... umm... yes... It's you!

What about a compromise? You stop breaking your lines in the middle of a sentence but you can break it after every point, question or exclamation mark. So that automatic translation works just fine.

@Lord

At latest since your 'Very bad habit', your postings seems to me like a Dejavu of what we have been getting featured each day on television and newspapers since about 3 years:

• unable to understand the simplest connections
• incapable of responding to the arguments of others
• unable to comprehend a sentence that goes beyond 5 words
• a very simplified view of the world
• constant twisting of facts
• assumption of facts, which are actually to be assigned to him
• not want to see that he makes a complete fool out of himself with ridiculous arguments

Lord wrote:You know why good books ... put their pages in columns?"

I'm beginning to understand what you mean by a good book. Yes, these books in paperback format, where the text is presented in speech bubbles, have very short lines. But I have to disappoint you, these things are generally not classified as 'good books'. As already mentioned, in really 'good books' the text goes across the entire page width, without columns.

Josh wrote:

Lord wrote:So don't use translaters, instead learn the language.

How many foreign languages do you speak?

Second reminder. Your answer is still missing.