Re: Start PureBasic? Or even with VB.Net?
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:52 pm
@Shardik
the exception proves the rule.
purebasic is an indie language. there is simply no room for indie languages in professional environments. reliability is the most important thing for a company. indie languages tend to change a lot, and things keep breaking between versions. a company cant afford such risks. they cant wait x years for a bugfix. the future of every indie language is uncertain. the support could end any day, and then what? im not saying these things to bash on purebasic. i think purebasic is great, but it is an indie language after all, and its userbase is tiny. how many people use purebasic? probably around 10k, while millions use C/C++ etc. but thats okay. that doesnt mean that purebasic is bad or whatever.
c ya,
nco2k
the exception proves the rule.

purebasic is an indie language. there is simply no room for indie languages in professional environments. reliability is the most important thing for a company. indie languages tend to change a lot, and things keep breaking between versions. a company cant afford such risks. they cant wait x years for a bugfix. the future of every indie language is uncertain. the support could end any day, and then what? im not saying these things to bash on purebasic. i think purebasic is great, but it is an indie language after all, and its userbase is tiny. how many people use purebasic? probably around 10k, while millions use C/C++ etc. but thats okay. that doesnt mean that purebasic is bad or whatever.
c ya,
nco2k