Page 2 of 2
Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:30 am
by PB
Oops, I don't know why I thought it would break existing code. I'm going so stupid. Forgive my post.
Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:48 pm
by Demivec
AND51 wrote:—1
Why all the
+1's ... ? I thought you want to omit the ,1 so actually you all should write -1 in this thread, shouldn't you?
Whether you use -1 or +1, both equate to TRUE.
Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:51 pm
by freak
This is one of the more entertaining feature requests i have to tell you
(Especially considering it has already been implemented. But don't tell anyone!
)
Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:05 pm
by Demivec
freak wrote:This is one of the more entertaining feature requests i have to tell you
(Especially considering it has already been implemented. But don't tell anyone!
)
Glad to hear it.
Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:30 pm
by skywalk
Demivec wrote:Whether you use -1 or +1, both equate to TRUE.
And don't forget "0"
Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:54 pm
by AND51
So true, skwalk... 