Page 2 of 2

Re: Rosetta Code

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:46 pm
by Vera
This is just great Image Image Image

Thank you so much - you diligent task solvers :lol:

@All
don't worry - you can still go for an unsolved challenge - as they seem to grow just at the same amount :wink:

cheers ~ Vera

Re: Rosetta Code

Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 2:43 pm
by KJ67
Vera is correct, much has been completed but we still have a lot to show!

Why not have a quick look at Tasks not implemented in PureBasic and do a task or two? It's a nice place to show what PB can do... Image

Re: Rosetta Code

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 9:03 pm
by PureLeo
Very cool site! *solving tasks right now*

Re: Rosetta Code

Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:14 pm
by Vera
~ today ~ Image Image Image

As the RosettaCodeWiki is unstoppable increasing and PureBasic has reached a respectable presence by now, it would be suitable to include PureBasic to the Language-Comparison-Table as well.

I would have done it already if only I could answer all the items
:?

As the table is quite unhandy I thought to make a simple list of all those items with examples of possible and occuring answers.
REQUEST: please could someone look through this list and re-post it with the proper significances, so I can include it to the comparison table.

greetings ~ Vera


Language - PureBasic - (???)
========================
Paradigm(s) - concurrent, distributed, generic, imperative, object-oriented, procedural, reflective, functional, event-driven, aspect-oriented, goal directed, concatenative,
&
Standardized - Yes, No, ISO, ANSI, ECMA,
-----------------
Type strength - strong, weak, soft, meek, firm, depending on context, untyped
&
Type safety - safe, unsafe, (unsafe allowed), n/a
-----------------
Expression of types - explicit, implicit, partially implicit, optional inferred, optional explicit,
&
Type compatibility - nominative, structural, duck, (aka duck) , complex conversions system, polymorphic
-----------------
Type checking - static, dynamic, (by choise), dynamic (for interop)
-----------------
Parameter Passing (Methods Available) - by value, by reference (compiler chosen), (programmer chosen), (through pointers), (through reference types), according to data type, immutable data structures, syntactically by value but safe sharing of compound data types, depending if the type is mutable or immutable
-----------------
Garbage collection - Yes, No, Reference counting, some types, Only of unnamed entities,
-----------------
Intended use - Application, Scripting, System, functional research, End User Programming, General, Web Development, Data processing, 3D Art Tools, ...
-----------------
Design goals - Simplicity, Low level access, Minimal constraint, Rapid application development, Abstraction, Efficiency, Compatibility, Correctness, Modularity, Readability, Ease of use, Performance, Lightness, Reliability, Safety, Simple syntax, Small, Robustness, .... 'CROSSPLATTFORM'
=========================

Re: Rosetta Code

Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:47 am
by Vera
Image Image Image

Image

enjoy some "Summertime"