PureBasic Forums - English

Not a huge deal. With PB v4.40 you can no longer plot outside the image bounds with ImageOutput(). A tweak here or there would set it right.

; left mouse click - move selected node To center
; right mouse click - add child To selected node

Just for information i obtain that

And nothing move with left or right click
W2000 PRO SP4 v4.40

The same bug than jpg decoder.

cool!

EDIT: added feature for checking objects outside the image bounds

updated code in first post

I have a stupid question. It's all neat and everything, and maybe i'm a little dense this morning (ok, no comments ), but what would be a practical application of this ?

it's for visual exploration of relations between nodes. it's usefull for viewing network topology, partnerships, etc..

SFSxOI wrote:I have a stupid question. It's all neat and everything, and maybe i'm a little dense this morning (ok, no comments ), but what would be a practical application of this ?

The "Oooh pretty!" factor.

Enterprise level systems sell over things like that.

SFSxOI wrote:I have a stupid question. It's all neat and everything, and maybe i'm a little dense this morning (ok, no comments ), but what would be a practical application of this ?

THIS morning??? You and I are the founders of the Dense in the AM club!

If you could link nodes to other already existing nodes you would have a tool like the FBI uses to build relationship maps between gang members /terror suspects / innocent citizens!

Very impressive!

There still seem to be an error with this line (about line 400) Try adding nine consecutive nodes, move node four to the center and add twelve consecutive nodes after this node. Remember to turn on the debugger

Rook Zimbabwe wrote:

SFSxOI wrote:I have a stupid question. It's all neat and everything, and maybe i'm a little dense this morning (ok, no comments ), but what would be a practical application of this ?

THIS morning??? You and I are the founders of the Dense in the AM club!

If you could link nodes to other already existing nodes you would have a tool like the FBI uses to build relationship maps between gang members /terror suspects / innocent citizens!

LoL

Nodes might be OK for hardware or even virtual network or networking topology (both human and virtual) to show a basic picture, but for stuff like the relationships you mentioned you need interactive relational vectors and not just nodes to show ancillary and associated involvement/interaction as it occurs to get a clear picture. So for something like the relationships you mentioned its not suitable.

Yep... true... butthat gives him somewhere to go with it if he wants!

SFSxOI wrote:

Rook Zimbabwe wrote:

SFSxOI wrote:I have a stupid question. It's all neat and everything, and maybe i'm a little dense this morning (ok, no comments ), but what would be a practical application of this ?

THIS morning??? You and I are the founders of the Dense in the AM club!

If you could link nodes to other already existing nodes you would have a tool like the FBI uses to build relationship maps between gang members /terror suspects / innocent citizens!

LoL

Nodes might be OK for hardware or even virtual network or networking topology (both human and virtual) to show a basic picture, but for stuff like the relationships you mentioned you need interactive relational vectors and not just nodes to show ancillary and associated involvement/interaction as it occurs to get a clear picture. So for something like the relationships you mentioned its not suitable.

Awesome.

Fred wrote: Awesome.

Yeah.

I have to agree with Fred.

I didn't understand half of Rook's words either...

I just tried the code (edited version with bound checking) with PB 4.41 RC 1 and NT4 : it's better (it can see the circles and the first point) but it still crashes (invalid memory access at line 609 [EndProcedure]).