Page 2 of 3

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:34 pm
by Kwai chang caine
I think they are busy enough caring for serious problems...
Of course, it's not the most problem of the world
But this request exist for a long long time ago.
When i have begin in 2005 already i read this request.

That's strange that the TEAM don't do this, when she see the number of request in all the forum.

I don't know anything, all the people know that, then i can't give advice at the TEAM :oops:
But i'm in the same advice of PB, it's surely not so hard to do this :roll:

But when a request is so numerous, it's surprising that the TEAM don't added this function :cry:
I don't like that VB do something that my PB lover can't do :? :lol:

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:41 pm
by Kaeru Gaman
read the last post on side 1, too.

and:

numerous request do not at all mean that a majority of the Users request it.

it is no fix, because there is no malfunction.


... and I either would serve some hoochie-coochie-flowerous-choko-top-on-it-request just to have it done and keep the voices quiet.

PS:
I don't like that VB do something that my PB lover can't do
ok, donate five million euros to fred, then he can pay a two-dozen-people-team to mess around like the MS-fuzzies did for VB...

... heck, what is this kind of comparison?
keep the church in the village, Cain!

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:11 pm
by PB
> why waste manpower with some nice-to-have-task that is easily replaced
> by one of a dozen avaliable plugins?

Because native is always better. Your argument is basically saying that all
third-party libs (like gnozal's) should NEVER become native functions either.

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:15 pm
by Kwai chang caine
You have posted in the same time to me KAERU
so why waste manpower with some nice-to-have-task that is easily replaced by one of a dozen avaliable plugins?
I have try a time a code who do this function.
But he have modify my code :cry:
ok, donate five million euros to fred, then he can pay a two-dozen-people-team to mess around like the MS-fuzzies did for VB...
Be quiet, if this function is so expensive.....then ok, it's normal that the TEAM renounce to her :roll:

More seriously, sometime the TEAM added function and i'm not sure that is the majority of users request it :roll:
But if you say that i'm wrong, i believe you

I think that in the beginning, FRED don't think at this function, and now it's always like that.
But it's true that with the SQL, HTML or API, who have long instructions, sometimes it's difficult to manage

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:32 pm
by Kaeru Gaman
PB wrote:Your argument is basically saying that all
third-party libs (like gnozal's) should NEVER become native functions either.
this is solid bullshit and you know it!
saying "I don't want rain today" does not mean "I want to live in Namib"...

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:39 pm
by pdwyer
I dunno, 4.30 is out, time for some house cleaning of these smaller tasks :D

I'd love to see multi line code for working with SQL

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:40 pm
by Kwai chang caine
this is solid bullshit and you know it!
:shock:

I think that KAERU have a fit of anger today :roll:
I'd love to see multi line code for working with SQL
:wink:

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:45 pm
by PB
Kwaï chang caïne wrote:
this is solid bullshit and you know it!
:shock:

I think that KAERU have a fit of anger today :roll:
:lol: It wasn't meant to evoke such a response, I must admit.

Okay, as of right now, my New Year's Resolution: no fighting with anyone on
these forums anymore. Sorry, Kaeru. Sorry, Trond. No more from me again.

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:19 pm
by Kwai chang caine
It wasn't meant to evoke such a response, I must admit.
Okay, as of right now, my New Year's Resolution: no fighting with anyone on
Cool ...you are great 8)
What is your antidepressant.....i want it :lol:

And i want also a return of line in the code :D
Ok ok i go out me too, PB :oops: :lol:

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:22 pm
by PB
> What is your antidepressant.....i want it :lol:

IT'S YOU! :) You made me laugh and I felt ashamed for fighting as a result.

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:25 pm
by Kaeru Gaman
PB wrote:It wasn't meant to evoke such a response, I must admit.
I didn't mean to be mean.. sorry, too.
It's just disgusting to be confronted with seemingly willingly misinterpretation of my statements.
but now it seems I got you wrong.

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:17 pm
by pdwyer
Group hug!

:twisted:

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:55 pm
by Kwai chang caine
All that, for a return of line :shock:
It's a proof that it's not a little subject :lol:

Like usually all are right, because all say the same thing.
But the difference is like each say the sentence :wink:

@pdwyer
It's what a "Group hug" :shock:
My friend translate "Event", it's not that ???
And my other friend say "take in your arms"
Sometime, the english is also difficult that the french :?

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:19 pm
by Kaeru Gaman
Kwaï chang caïne wrote:It's what a "Group hug" :shock:
group hug

...syntetic french:
enlacement en touffe

could that match? I don't speak any french at all...

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:35 pm
by Kwai chang caine
Your translater is not more good that mine :lol:
But i understand, that's a kind expression 8)

Yes, it's a new years then :

Interlace in bush
or
Embrace in bush
or
Squeezing in tuft

It's the traduction world at world of "Enlacement en touffe" :lol:

Thanks for to have tried of translate this sentence 8)
It's the fault of PDWYER, :? why use so difficult words :lol:

But it's sure that with this type of short sentence, he don't need of special character to cut this line in multiline :lol: :lol:

I want to suggest at MICROSOFT to create a new API

Code: Select all

GroupHug_(Enlacement.s, en.s, Touffe)
:D

Like this, no need of underscore at the end of this long long long instruction :lol: