Multiple command in the same line

Kwai chang caine · Post by **Kwai chang caine** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:34 pm

I think they are busy enough caring for serious problems...

Of course, it's not the most problem of the world
But this request exist for a long long time ago.
When i have begin in 2005 already i read this request.

That's strange that the TEAM don't do this, when she see the number of request in all the forum.

I don't know anything, all the people know that, then i can't give advice at the TEAM

But i'm in the same advice of PB, it's surely not so hard to do this :roll:

But when a request is so numerous, it's surprising that the TEAM don't added this function

I don't like that VB do something that my PB lover can't do

Kaeru Gaman · Post by **Kaeru Gaman** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:41 pm

read the last post on side 1, too.

and:

numerous request do not at all mean that a majority of the Users request it.

it is no fix, because there is no malfunction.

... and I either would serve some hoochie-coochie-flowerous-choko-top-on-it-request just to have it done and keep the voices quiet.

PS:

I don't like that VB do something that my PB lover can't do

ok, donate five million euros to fred, then he can pay a two-dozen-people-team to mess around like the MS-fuzzies did for VB...

... heck, what is this kind of comparison?
keep the church in the village, Cain!

PB · Post by PB » Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:11 pm

> why waste manpower with some nice-to-have-task that is easily replaced
> by one of a dozen avaliable plugins?

Because native is always better. Your argument is basically saying that all
third-party libs (like gnozal's) should NEVER become native functions either.

Kwai chang caine · Post by **Kwai chang caine** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:15 pm

You have posted in the same time to me KAERU

so why waste manpower with some nice-to-have-task that is easily replaced by one of a dozen avaliable plugins?

I have try a time a code who do this function.
But he have modify my code

ok, donate five million euros to fred, then he can pay a two-dozen-people-team to mess around like the MS-fuzzies did for VB...

Be quiet, if this function is so expensive.....then ok, it's normal that the TEAM renounce to her :roll:

More seriously, sometime the TEAM added function and i'm not sure that is the majority of users request it :roll:
But if you say that i'm wrong, i believe you

I think that in the beginning, FRED don't think at this function, and now it's always like that.
But it's true that with the SQL, HTML or API, who have long instructions, sometimes it's difficult to manage

Kaeru Gaman · Post by **Kaeru Gaman** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:32 pm

PB wrote:Your argument is basically saying that all
third-party libs (like gnozal's) should NEVER become native functions either.

this is solid bullshit and you know it!
saying "I don't want rain today" does not mean "I want to live in Namib"...

pdwyer · Post by **pdwyer** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:39 pm

I dunno, 4.30 is out, time for some house cleaning of these smaller tasks

I'd love to see multi line code for working with SQL

Kwai chang caine · Post by **Kwai chang caine** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:40 pm

this is solid bullshit and you know it!

I think that KAERU have a fit of anger today :roll:

I'd love to see multi line code for working with SQL

PB · Post by PB » Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:45 pm

Kwaï chang caïne wrote:
this is solid bullshit and you know it!

I think that KAERU have a fit of anger today :roll:

It wasn't meant to evoke such a response, I must admit.

Okay, as of right now, my New Year's Resolution: no fighting with anyone on
these forums anymore. Sorry, Kaeru. Sorry, Trond. No more from me again.

Kwai chang caine · Post by **Kwai chang caine** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:19 pm

It wasn't meant to evoke such a response, I must admit.
Okay, as of right now, my New Year's Resolution: no fighting with anyone on

Cool ...you are great

What is your antidepressant.....i want it

And i want also a return of line in the code

Ok ok i go out me too, PB

PB · Post by PB » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:22 pm

> What is your antidepressant.....i want it

IT'S YOU!

You made me laugh and I felt ashamed for fighting as a result.

Kaeru Gaman · Post by **Kaeru Gaman** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:25 pm

PB wrote:It wasn't meant to evoke such a response, I must admit.

I didn't mean to be mean.. sorry, too.
It's just disgusting to be confronted with seemingly willingly misinterpretation of my statements.
but now it seems I got you wrong.

pdwyer · Post by **pdwyer** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:17 pm

Group hug!

Kwai chang caine · Post by **Kwai chang caine** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:55 pm

All that, for a return of line

It's a proof that it's not a little subject

Like usually all are right, because all say the same thing.
But the difference is like each say the sentence

@pdwyer
It's what a "Group hug"

My friend translate "Event", it's not that ???
And my other friend say "take in your arms"
Sometime, the english is also difficult that the french

Kaeru Gaman · Post by **Kaeru Gaman** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:19 pm

Kwaï chang caïne wrote:It's what a "Group hug"

group hug

...syntetic french:
enlacement en touffe

could that match? I don't speak any french at all...

Kwai chang caine · Post by **Kwai chang caine** » Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:35 pm

Your translater is not more good that mine

But i understand, that's a kind expression

Yes, it's a new years then :

Interlace in bush
or
Embrace in bush
or
Squeezing in tuft

It's the traduction world at world of "Enlacement en touffe"

Thanks for to have tried of translate this sentence

It's the fault of PDWYER,

why use so difficult words

But it's sure that with this type of short sentence, he don't need of special character to cut this line in multiline

I want to suggest at MICROSOFT to create a new API

Code: Select all

GroupHug_(Enlacement.s, en.s, Touffe)

Like this, no need of underscore at the end of this long long long instruction