Page 2 of 3

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 3:12 pm
by SFSxOI
Irene wrote:
Any more ideas to keep this sytem cool? Temperatures are still high (as in could be better) and I would like to know how I can keep it cooler without sacrificing silence. Thanks in advance!

Cheers, Irene.
Irene;

If your going to keep using air cooling that means moving air. Moving air around involves fans normally, fans have noise. Now that being said, having multiple fans means multiple noise sources but normally these fans are like 20 mm to 40 mm or something in that range, there are very large fans in the 70 mm range that move a lot of air but have about the same sound level as a 20 or 40 mm fan. If you can replace multiple fans with a larger one that moves a greater amount of air then you end up with a lower overall sound level but greater cooling capability due to a larger amount of air moving but it doesn't sound like, unless you mod the case in some way, that your set up to handle such larger fans.

I see from your case pics that you do have a place for an intake fan at the front of the case, but I assume youv'e already considered that. If the fan is really contained in the case the noise level is cut down a little and that might help. The trick with internally mounted fans is to keep them from recirculating heated internal case air, a lot of people just mount the fan at the front and assume that its drawing in cool air when its actually also drawing in air from the case also, this decreases the effectivness of the fan and although it is moving air the total volume of the air is warmer then it should be, sealing is important here.

The top of the internal case temp, the correct way to do this temp measurement is with a wet bulb thermometer technique (a lot of people don't know that) and most don't have a wet bulb available or know how to propely do this. The wet bulb will give an indication of air flow at the top by the evaporation action of the wetting solution, this is expressed in a temperature reading vs time (there are charts), basically the faster the evaporation takes place the faster the wet bulb temp drops which can be used to extrapolate an air flow ratio with the higher the ratio the better and faster the air is moving, and generally this is an indication of how well the air is circulated in the case. Heated air setting in the top of the case and not being moved fast enough starts to form a sort of cealing for the cooler incoming air (remember basic science - hot air rises and cool air falls (is heavier) ). The more this cealing increases the less cool air volume in the case because as the cooler air comes in it backs up against this warmer air which has effectively reduced the cooler air volume in the case by taking up space the cooler air could have occupied. In addition where the warmer and cooler air meet it causes disturbances in the air flow sort of like you see on a weather report but on a smaller scale, this effectively causes disruptions in the cooler air reaching the components and may actually cause air to flow away from the areas its needed in and destroys the effectiveness of the air moving devices (the fans). The entire air space in the case should be occupied by the cooler air and very little to none of the warmer air, the case should have a fast positive pressure air flow at the heat source. So warm air collecting in the top of the case and not being removed quickly enough is a bad thing. By removing the warmer air fast enough you could see a few temps difference in the case and with the heated components, maybe as much as between 5 to 10 degree difference in some cases. A lot of people ignore this and most case design ignores this also.

One thing about air cooling, a rule of thumb, the computer overall internally will only be as cool as the air is draws in and circulates but you can increases the efficiency at which this air is used to cool. The trick here is to make the air move across the heat source faster with a positive pressure across the heat source, it will not dramatically lower the circulated internal case air temp but it will remove heat faster leading to a lowering of temps of the heat source (the CPU for example), exahusting the heated air in the case can also not be ignored and is important. This effect can also be created or affected by heat sink design. You can tell if your exausting the heated air in the case fast or well enough by measuring the temp of the heat collected at the top of the case on the case inside (see the wet bulb thing above).

The stock heat sink that comes with the CPU from intel is designed to keep the CPU in an operating range in still air with only the CPU heat sink fan moving any air not at a certain temperature. Adding an unobstructed air flow to this helps a lot and is based on the need for a constant unobstructed air flow across and away from the CPU, giving the air flow an unobstructed shot to the CPU is a prime consideration for air cooling and enhances the capability of the stock heat sink/fan combo. A lot of people think if they lower the temp of the CPU below the designed operating range temp they are doing something good, and they are in some respects of making them feel better, but remember the CPU was made to operate in a certain temp range so its actually not going to be detrimental to operate the CPU in its design range. CPU's cooled below their design range don't necessarily operate better all the time, they mostly just operate cooler. Although CPU's cooled below at least twice their design range do begin to show advantages of faster operation such cooling isn't within the capabilities of most people and start requiring special techniques such as ducting in air conditioning or even going as far as water cooling with frozen or chilled cooling liquids, immersion in chilled cooling liquids, or even a liquid nitrogen heat sink system (I saw one of these once - you don't want to get into it).

If a CPU operating temp range is for example 30C to 80C (I just made these figures up) and it normally runs at say 50 C and you lower the temp to 40C, yes thats great as far as making you feel better about the temp, but it really doesn't do anything for the CPU operation because its still operating in its design temp range.

Some people also put on too much thermal compound between the heat sink and the CPU, you only need the thinnest layer and you don't need any of that fancy stuff like artic silver or anything. The thermal compound layer between the heatsink and the CPU is actually intended to fill very small (most you can't see with the naked eye) gaps and voids in a metal to metal contact. The gaps and voids cause hot spots which affect the overall CPU temp, filling these with a thermally conductive material, that white thermal compound, eliminates these voids by filling them when the surfaces are put together. Something like Artic Silver may make some people feel better (and I know there are lots of claims for what it does), but the presence of metal in a heatsink coumpound might be counter productive when all you need to do is fill the voids and adding metal doesn't do anything really to help this at all. (Yes, I know a lot of people are going to jump on this and tell me how wrong I am, but its true despite what anyone says and any engineer that specializes in heatsink design can tell you the same thing) . That white thermal compound is OK to use, just a very thin layer is needed in the majority of cases, almost thin enough to see thru but fully coating with no spaces in it. (NOTE: Where a metal based thermal compound becomes useful is when the CPU temp is cooled to at least twice its design range temp.). Too much thermal compound is actually detrimental.

So anyway, your left with air cooling if thats your choice. You could do water cooling but some how I don't get the impression you want to get into that. Then your left with the options of increasing air flow, exhausting air, and heat sink fin surface, all of which are going to increase noise level to some degree (if the heat sink has a fan on it). So in the end if your going to stick with air cooling you really have only air movement as an option. Ensure a direct flow of air to the heat source, ensure a good heat sink, and ensure air is in enough volume and fast enough, and ensure air is removed from the case as quickly as possible, and it really helps also if the air your drawing into the case is cooler. Also ensure the case has a positive pressure flow of air at the heat source and that heated case air does not get recirculated and is removed as quickly as possible. At some point with air cooling your going to have to settle for what you can get or do within the capabilities of how far you want to take it. In short, you want your air cooling to be as efficient and as effective as possible.

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:59 pm
by Irene
Wau O.O''

That's the first time I hear of that stuff and it seems truer than what's said on most PC modding forums. I am really glad you shared your knowledge with me! THANK YOU SO MUCH!

Ok, understanding your message you want to say that
a) temperatures aren't that important
b) more exhausts than intakes are preferred
c) less fans, but greater air movement
d) avoid exhausted hot air to get back in
e) don't buy everything commercials say
f) make sure the PC is in a ventilated area

Taking consideration of all your points the people at Nexus did really make a good job then. Like their advertised picture shows, my case does really have "perfect airflow" (or did I understand something wrong?):
Image

Well then I think I will put the case modding idea to rest and instead take care of the cables. All my SATA and SCSI cables are directly next to the PCI slots and they ultimately block the air coming in (I'm glad I invested in rounded SCSI cables).

So I shouldn't worry about the temperatures that much and rely more on the air circulation of the overall setup?

Cheers, Irene.

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:10 pm
by traumatic
Irene wrote:[...]and trust me, the so-called circuits which perform what is known as "noise cancelling" is truly a software noise gate.
Sorry to go slightly OT but people are selling soundcards w/ noisegates?! OMG.

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:13 pm
by SFSxOI
"a) temperatures aren't that important "

If its operating in its designed temp range and stays there you really shouldn' need to worry.

That pic you showed has the air being exhausted thru the power supply. Thats not the best way. The fan in the power supply was intended to keep the air flowing across the power supply. The fact that a lot of case designers want it to do double duty by letting it be the primary source of air exhaust for the entire case sounds good in theory but in practice its not so good. You need to exhaust the warm air in the power supply, yes, but for the whole case what you actually end up with the air movement slowing down at the top of the case because the case air is going to be exhausted at a slower rate thru the power supply because of the warmer air thats already there from the power supply which results in slower moving air creating that cealing effect but just in a smaller area, you don't want that cealing effect at all if you can avoid it. You actually want a system that doesn't rely on the power supply fan for exhaust for the case.

The air thru the bottom is fine if the fan in the power supply moves enough air to serve the whole case, but most power supply fans are only intended to move air for the power supply. Its why power supplys come with fans, for the power supply.

Regarding air intake through the bottom, its fine as long as there is enough clearance between the surface and the air intake and the air intake is the right size. But also consider for bottom intake systems whats between the air intake internally and the heat sources...are there cards plugged in that keeps the majority of air from direct encounter with the heat source not creating a fast moving positive air flow at the heat source? If so then thats bad because the air is routed away from the heat source towards the inside of the case side and up and around the heat source. This keeps a positive and fast moving air flow away from the heat source which is something you don't want to do. Its better to have the air flow across a card in the way then to have the are flow meet the greater surface area of the card. So even in your case in the pic I would still do things differently because although it does what its supposed to do, its still not doing it the best it could do and re-arranging things would be better. Any deflected or slowed air flow is not positive air flow, its wasted air flow and is not efficient for air cooling.

BTW, something to keep in mind with future cases, cases with power supplies mounted in the bottom of the case at the back are better then cases with power supplies at the top. And when doing mounted bottom power supplies you want a power supply with an exhaust fan at the back and an intake fan on the top (like the Rosewill power supplies, and others).

"So I shouldn't worry about the temperatures that much and rely more on the air circulation of the overall setup?"

Your got it. For air cooling, you shouldn't worry about the temps so much if things are in their design operating range, and along with air circulation you also want to concentrate on using and moving that air efficiently and inducing positive air flow at the hot spots.

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:03 pm
by Irene
@traumatic: Quoting my good friend the Wikipedia:
In audio post-processing, noise gating reduces steady noise sources such as rumble from LP records, hiss from audio tape, static from a radio or amplifier, and hum from a power system, without greatly affecting the source sound.
So in other words, when this "noise cancelling circuitry" is turned on, a hidden software noise gate eliminates the hiss from the microphone and line inputs after the signal has passed through physically and before the signal is amplified like with microphone boost. Keeping a good balance between the timing and the limiting of the noise will make the audio sound clearer when it is not. Simple audio basics and Creative knows how to sell sound cards = business. Not expensive circuitry. Of course, there are professional sound cards with true circuitry, which can be programmed to cancel unwanted noise before the signal passes physically. In this case the passed audio, when amplified, will sound like the original.

But now let's get back to the actual problem...

So, SFSxOI, what would you do in my situation? Get a different case? Too bad as I can't get a refund for it and am not really willing to pay hundreds for a good case (and yes I have had very bad experience with budget cases). When I have the money though, I might consider combining air cooling with water cooling so the power supply won't need to do too much work on its own when exhausting air. I guess you're a hobbyist PC modder and would mod the case, right? So is the Nexus Breeze a bad idea and I wasted my money for nothing? I'm not that sure about what I should do now. Thank you for any help!

Cheers, Irene.

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:23 pm
by traumatic
Irene, actually a good soundcard (audio-interface) doesn't alter the sound at
all. That's what they are built for - transparency. A gate relies on a certain
signal level and attack and is nothing you'd typically want on the sum (it can
be useful on single tracks though) - that's why I asked. I'm just astonished
that after all this pseudo 3D hype kind of things the industry now seems to
tend to fully cheat on the consumers.

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:17 pm
by Irene
traumatic wrote:Irene, actually a good soundcard (audio-interface) doesn't alter the sound at
all. That's what they are built for - transparency. A gate relies on a certain
signal level and attack and is nothing you'd typically want on the sum (it can
be useful on single tracks though) - that's why I asked. I'm just astonished
that after all this pseudo 3D hype kind of things the industry now seems to
tend to fully cheat on the consumers.
Of course they cheat the customers! However, you are a bit wrong to some degree. Professional sound cards are fully programmable. I have worked with a few (rare) professional sound cards which had a programmable FX processor that could process the audio in any way you wanted before or after the pre-amplification of the microphone. The key is, it's programmable. Also, the FX processor was specialized in enhancing vocal tracks and among the factory presets there were numerous noise gate patches available. The studio where I worked then was of course rented and I am not sure about the details, but Emagic was the producer of that sound card. The sound of the sound card was amazing and it was my first trip into the real DAW world.

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:08 pm
by SFSxOI
Irene wrote:
But now let's get back to the actual problem...

So, SFSxOI, what would you do in my situation? Get a different case? Too bad as I can't get a refund for it and am not really willing to pay hundreds for a good case (and yes I have had very bad experience with budget cases). When I have the money though, I might consider combining air cooling with water cooling so the power supply won't need to do too much work on its own when exhausting air. I guess you're a hobbyist PC modder and would mod the case, right? So is the Nexus Breeze a bad idea and I wasted my money for nothing? I'm not that sure about what I should do now. Thank you for any help!

Cheers, Irene.
Now now, don't fret. The situation might be rescued some with a little work. You don't always need to buy an expensive case to have your objectives met, but the problem with budget cases is they tend to limit what you can do without modding the case in terms of air cooling.

Consider first if you really need to do anything at all. If you really want the temps to be lower after considering things then about your only option is to add and manipulate air flow so its more effective and where you need it most. Thats going to mean maybe adding some fans and rearranging some things on the inside a little like moving a hard drive to the bottom of the case and placed on its side, and stuff like that. If your going to stick with that case and the temps are really bothering you, and you mentioned this, then go with water cooling. Other then that and to stay with air cooling, your going to need to basically put more free flowing air in the hot spots thats focused on them and let the existing air flow take care of getting rid of the exhaust. Outside of that and modding the case its self we need to start thinking in terms of re-directing and adding air flow some.

Before beginning anything its a good idea to take a look at the reality of the situation in terms of what you can do to affect things, so here goes:

If I were going to mod that case one of the first things i'd consider for it would probably be a blow hole with a large fan at the top exhausting out the top as that would make the air intake from the bottom more effective because the air would move faster thus leaving warmed air in place for less time. The only draw back to adding the blow hole in this case, although the over all case temp would probably improve, the air flow at the hot spots would probably remain basically the same because the air being drawn in from the bottom is directly blocked by cards in the slots. But even in this case the temps at the hot spots might improve some because the warm air would be setting in the hot spot areas for a less amount of time, it just would not be a dramatic improvement, maybe a few degrees at most but it could be better then just a few also. I'd have to experiment with the case or a mock up to really tell or at least physically see the case to get a real sense of effectiveness, pics don't do much good in a case like this.

But... that case isn't all that bad, it serves its purpose, it just doesn't give you a lot of options outside of modding to affect the temps very much. The airflow pic is a concept that didn't really make it in my opinion. Pic looks good, but look at it carefully, this is what I see in my opinion if you have any cards installed (and i'm assuming you do)...for example...it shows (or implies) air travelling in between the cards, but what is pushing that air into the spaces between the cards?...nothing at all so the air is not really flowing in between the cards at any significant pressure really. Even if it were flowing with enough volume and pressure in between the cards it would be wasted because most cards don't need cooling other then maybe a graphics card which most times comes with its own cooling fan/system so it doesn't need all that much more cooling. Then the air flow pic shows a direct path to the CPU area, but ignores the fact that most if not all of that air is blocked by the cards below it and the major pressure of the air flow would be directed over the top of the heat sink when you want it directed at the heat sink. Then there is an air flow to the right of the CPU area that barely touches the CPU area and most of that has lost its force of flow from being blocked by the cards partially and then what does reach the CPU area is only on one side of the CPU so there is going to be a temp difference between the two sides of the CPU area thats going to effectively negate that air flow effect. Then the air flow pic assumes the PS fan is also going to serve as cooling for the hard drive area but a PS fan doesn't have enough force to pull that air fast enough so your left with adding to the hot air cealing at the top of the case due to slower moving air. I'd bet in that case if you could measure the air flow at the CPU area it would be almost nil (not considering the CPU heatsink fan). So basically your heatsink fan is doing the major cooling for your CPU, and from what youv'e said about the temps the heatsink/fan combo seems to be doing its job effectively by keeping the CPU in its design operating temp range which is exactly what its designed to do.

Myself, when i'm thinking about modding a case it takes me about a month, sometimes two, to decide what exactly I want to do and achieve and plan it out. I put the mods on paper and make life sized templates on cardboard or poster board, I've even built life sized mock ups of cases using 1/8 inch or 1/4 inch foam board and do the mods on the mock up first and test to make sure the mods meet my objectives, before I even think about touching it. My wife thinks i'm nuts when I do this. Lately though i've been buying my cases with enough air flow already because the computers are in a cooled room all year long (air conditioning) so they get cool air to begin with. The other computers in the house (networked) are not used for anything other then surfing or my wifes use and she isn't a gamer so their cooling is suitable for their use.

The temps you see now are not that bad. Things seem to be in their designed operating range. Could you benefit with some additional air flow? Yes, you could. Will adding fans do you any good? Yes, if you place them correctly...but overall will they be effective? Well yes and no, the place you would probably add fans would be at the front and an exhaust at the rear, but the front drive bay area where the fans would need to be added are setting too far forward for the normal bargan fan so you will need some high CFM fans to push the air into the case in enough volume and pressure to create a flow across the CPU heat sink. In addition the only place I see that was a dual use area for either a drive bay or fan was towards the bottom which means the air stream will not be directed towards the CPU area. The placement of the fan would need to be situated such that it was basically in line with the CPU heat sink placement which might mean moving a drive bay and thus the drives.

So, considering trouble, time, effort, cost, and not moding the case, and what might turn out to be less then desired results, is it worth it to you to go to the trouble? Myself if I were going to stay with air cooling, in your case, I would try some fans and lowering the room air temp some. Air conditioning costs money, but....very small portable room AC units are a cost effective temporary solution for lowering room temps several degrees constant if the room is dedicated to the computer use, might not be such a good idea if the room is not dedicated. I would also research heat sink solutions as well, there are some good solutions out there in particular the heat pipe types, but they vary greatly so do some research first and ignore the sales hype and look at the specs and compare. Then I would start planning out a new air cooling system in a new case that was more suited to my objective, or go with another cooling solution like water cooling.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:46 pm
by Irene
Hi SFSxOI!

Thanks for the help so far! Now I have considered all of my options and the situation is like this:

a) a water cooling kit (requires modding of the case)
b) Nexus WaveAir (doesn't require modding)
c) more fans (requires modding of the case)

So option b is what I like most, but will it help much? You are saying that air should get in at high volumes but should be exhausted fast enough to have only cool air inside the case, right? Here's a link to the WaveAir: http://www.nexustek.nl/NXS-nexus-waveair.htm

My motherboard allows installing the WaveAir at the first PCI slot. The graphics card is in the second PCI slot so that would make the WaveAir force air to get out directly after the PCI cards. This would make a change in the airflow so the air gets exhausted at the top through the PSU fan but also at the back through the WaveAir. Because the WaveAir will be in the first PCI slot wouldn't it draw air directly to the CPU cooler?

Downsides of the WaveAir: it will block the use of some onboard connections (most notably the ethernet port) and it draws air through a tiny opening (the size of a PCI slot) so will it help that much?

After lots of thinking and using some paper to put my idea on, I came to the conclusion that I need to add more exhausts than intakes. At least a second exhaust. Then I will mod the front of the case panel to allow for another intake fan. Then I will run both intakes at lower RPM and for the gained silence I will guarantee more cooler air to get in. Also, I will manage the cables so they are transparent. In other words I need to make sure the air does not get blocked. Finally I will buy a HDD cooler with an intake fan, this will then help get cool air from all directions inside the case (bottom, lower front, upper front). Then I will buy a fan or the Antec SpotCool (http://www.antec.com/usa/productDetails ... s&id=75018) to direct some of the air at the PCI cards and so ensure a cooler environment for my graphics card.

I will try to make an illustration to show what I am after. Cheers, Irene.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:09 pm
by Irene
Image

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:46 pm
by traumatic
Irene wrote:[...]However, you are a bit wrong to some degree.[...]
No, I'm not. Maybe you are mistaking DSP solutions for audio interfaces?

Well, let's just stop the discussion here as it doesn't help anyone of us
anyway.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:54 pm
by Irene
traumatic wrote:Well, let's just stop the discussion here as it doesn't help anyone of us anyway.
...does help me get fun ^.^
Ok here's the deal. PM me or start a new thread. - Irene.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:01 pm
by SFSxOI
@Irene;

"So option b is what I like most, but will it help much? You are saying that air should get in at high volumes but should be exhausted fast enough to have only cool air inside the case, right?"

Now ya got the idea. Very good :) Yes, in your case option B is a good start, good choice. And I especially like this part of what you said: "After lots of thinking and using some paper to put my idea on, I came to the conclusion that I need to add more exhausts than intakes. " Now your starting out correctly and not just jumping into it like a lot of people do, planning is a good thing here. Very Good. :)

That WaveAir should help with the exhaust. Its says "WaveAir, 80mm Real Silent Nexus fan, PCI slot bracket" but look at the Acoustic Noise, its 17.6dB(A), its actually pretty quiet. So there will be a little noise but not that bad at all.

It looks like this is the fan they might be using in it: http://www.nexustek.nl/NXS-nexus80mmrea ... asefan.htm - 1500 RPM at 20.2 CFM

Is the PCI slot where your putting it in line with the CPU heat sink?

Have you considered adding two of the WaveAirs?

Have you investigated their heat sink solutions? I like their cooler at: http://www.nexustek.nl/NXS-XiR-2300_Xir ... Cooler.htm for a possible solution in your case maybe.... and because I just happen to have used one in a new build for someone, worked great and kept the CPU in the high 20's to low 30's Got it for free at a computer show so I couldn't pass it up, so i'm not sure of the price.

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:02 pm
by traumatic
Irene wrote:
traumatic wrote:Well, let's just stop the discussion here as it doesn't help anyone of us anyway.
...does help me get fun ^.^
Ok here's the deal. PM me or start a new thread. - Irene.
Nah, considering you supposedly already got your own, solid opinion in that respect I guess it wouldn't help. :)

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:50 pm
by Irene
SFSxOI wrote:Is the PCI slot where your putting it in line with the CPU heat sink?
Have you considered adding two of the WaveAirs?
Have you investigated their heat sink solutions?
- Yes, it is directly in line with the copper fins of the ZALMAN cooler ( http://www.zalman.co.kr/Eng/product/Pro ... sp?idx=156 )
- I did consider adding to WaveAirs, but the idea is still to be reworked. I need to get my first WaveAir to see if I can place a second one to see if it blocks the connections of my PCI cards (and I have a lot of them). Adding a second WaveAir will mean that the NVIDIA Quadro will be exactly in between the WaveAirs. That means better cooling for the Quadro and no need for an Antec SpotCool.
- I did investigate in their heat sink solutions, but I like ZALMAN products more (have had great success). All my past PCs had ZALMAN coolers as well and I am considering to "upgrade" my CNPS-7700 Cu to the CNPS-8000 ( http://www.zalman.co.kr/ENG/product/Pro ... sp?idx=163 ), because the latter is smaller and has so more room to get air from, but at the same time it's probably too small to play effectively in tandem with the WaveAir.

By the way, you did not comment on my illustration of the "Perfect Airflow". Anything to notice that could be reworked better? Also, about fans and such... I never liked pre-installed fans in any products (be it a case, HDD cage or anything else) and so I always buy aftermarket fans. You guessed it, the original bottom intake fan of my Nexus Breeze was quickly swapped to a ZALMAN ZM-F3. I said I like ZALMAN products ^o^

Cheers, Irene.