The PureBasic Documentation in PDF format
Please correct my english
http://purebasic.developpez.com/
http://purebasic.developpez.com/
-
- Addict
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:40 am
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Just printed out the B&W version.. full 

( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
Hey, really nice manual. Professional and highly addictive.
Parts of my daytime job for 8 years is writing user manuals for maritime display and maritime computers.
Only thing I though was highly irritating is the choice of fonts here.
Times New Romanish style.. I hate it. It gets so thin in the edges. The most ugly font in history IMO. Its only sufficient for boring novels in paper format. Should not be used for anything else, but that is of course my opinion.
Choosing Arial would be more pleasant to the eyes... and no...and I do not even like the stupid ugly ClearType introduced in Office 2007 etc.. that is a really ugly attempt to make something look "better". Blurrer I would say.
Parts of my daytime job for 8 years is writing user manuals for maritime display and maritime computers.
Only thing I though was highly irritating is the choice of fonts here.
Times New Romanish style.. I hate it. It gets so thin in the edges. The most ugly font in history IMO. Its only sufficient for boring novels in paper format. Should not be used for anything else, but that is of course my opinion.
Choosing Arial would be more pleasant to the eyes... and no...and I do not even like the stupid ugly ClearType introduced in Office 2007 etc.. that is a really ugly attempt to make something look "better". Blurrer I would say.
Regards Stone Oakvalley
Currently @ PB 5.70
Currently @ PB 5.70
- Pforzheimer
- User
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:12 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
I completely disagree.oakvalley wrote: Only thing I though was highly irritating is the choice of fonts here.
Times New Romanish style.. I hate it. It gets so thin in the edges. The most ugly font in history IMO. Its only sufficient for boring novels in paper format. Should not be used for anything else, but that is of course my opinion.
Choosing Arial would be more pleasant to the eyes... and no...and I do not even like the stupid ugly ClearType introduced in Office 2007 etc.. that is a really ugly attempt to make something look "better". Blurrer I would say.
Serif fonts (the one used in the Manual is Latin Modern/Computer Modern) are required when writing long texts, since the serifs work as useful hints for the eye and allow it to don't become tired too soon. Sans serif fonts, like Arial, are suited for short texts only.
Among professional typographers and designers, Arial is widely disliked -- not only it is an obvious rip-off of Helvetica, but it is actually flawed (e.g. the space devoted to the "1" is too wide, and so on). Arial became one of the most used fonts in the world only after it was shipped with Windows: so every professional designer knows that if something is made with Arial, is made by an amateur or by someone who does not recognizes the flaws of Arial with respect of other sans serif fonts like Helvetica or Franklin.