PureBasic Forums - English

Fluid Byte wrote:They can't because my code is hard to read.

I thought it was very clear to read. You isolated parts of code with well named procedures so what the example is doing is pretty self-explanatory. A good read and a good study.

So no worries. I will integrate item folding (and possible bugfixes) as soon as possible. So the user don't have be concerned about anything but hitting F5.

Yikes!

.

I thought it was very clear to read.

Shhhhhh!!

...so the user don't have be concerned about anything but hitting F5.

Oh I see, leave all the hard work to us then!

How much trouble would it be to add a thought projection interface? Come on, pull your finger out lad!

@nicolaus:
Source has been updated. Please try again.

@ FByte: That is first class coding there Mr.!

How much trouble would it be to add a thought projection interface?

I did that with mine... I just used the old #SillyRequestTPI routines!

Rook Zimbabwe wrote:

How much trouble would it be to add a thought projection interface?

I did that with mine... I just used the old #SillyRequestTPI routines!

Yeah..... I used those once too..... but the program just sat there doing nothing....... just like me

dontmailme wrote:

Rook Zimbabwe wrote:

How much trouble would it be to add a thought projection interface?

I did that with mine... I just used the old #SillyRequestTPI routines!

Yeah..... I used those once too..... but the program just sat there doing nothing....... just like me

I tried the latest code and it crashes (IMA) with Win98SE in PROV_WindowProc() [at ... = CreateSolidBrush_(*prcv\Color)].

Unicode is deactivated? Also you may try again with threadsafe on. It seemed to work for some people.

Impressive & useful.
Thx

thanks Fluid Byte

Thank you both.

Unicode + keyboard navigation will be integrated soon.

I tried adding item folding, but it was clear from the first moment I read the very structures you did not follow a hierarchical model, which is the model this sort of control is based on!!

doing simple stuff such as knowing how many childs a parent has becomes an issue without a proper hierarchical model.

I love the idea of simulating this sort of control, I love how you began working on it, but I just don't like the approach you took to do it.

If you ever plan on rewriting at least the structures, do use a parent-child model, because that will make further development of the control very very simple.

Right now it looks like it grew to that point where its better to keep on adding than changing half of it, for the sake of the universe continuum.

@Fluid Byte do you have any news ?

Nope sorry. I will be quite busy next week again. I havn't touched this project in my xmas vacation bacause I was to busy getting drunk.