Page 2 of 4
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:50 pm
by GeoTrail
Aaa thanks for the info.
I do have Droopy's lib installed. That must be what's causing it. Shame, it's one of my favorites
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:20 pm
by fsw
How about updating the Windows libraries to incorporate more Win API?
Every time PB is updated I have to kill pb's user32.lib and use another one just to get _wsprintfA back...
Thanks
.
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:59 am
by Progi1984
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:27 pm
by Chrono Syndrome
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:24 pm
by Karbon
Can someone post the "What's New" -- I don't want to install the beta but would still like to know what changes there are..
Thanks!
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:26 pm
by netmaestro
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:57 pm
by Konne
netmaestro wrote:Thanks so much for this! I'm thrilled with the power PureBasic keeps putting on, at this rate it won't be long before PB is generally recognized as the Gold Standard against which all other development platforms are judged. It's already that now, in my opinion. Hats off to very fine work.
The Librarys might be good and easy to use but the Syntax of PB is simply to blindfold to be the standard.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:15 pm
by michaeled314
So when will the full version of Purebasic 1.10 come out
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:27 pm
by srod
The Librarys might be good and easy to use but the Syntax of PB is simply to blindfold to be the standard.
Who wants a standard language?
It's like ansi c, you've programmed in one, and bugger me you've programed in them all!
No, PB is setting a standard all of its own.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 10:53 pm
by Dare
Yep ..
PureBasic can whup all other languages blindfolded
and with one hand tied behind it's back!
michaeled314 wrote:So when will the full version of Purebasic 1.10 come out
Several years ago.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:25 am
by Karbon
Good job guys!
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:56 am
by NoahPhense
The scary part is that I've coded out PB and C/C++ apps, of the same
nature and PB is faster than C.
So... no, *I* don't need C.
- np
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:22 pm
by blueznl
At least a Beta 3 then, please? I'd love to do a little more testing, but I need that editor somewhat fixed...
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:54 pm
by IceSoft
blueznl wrote:At least a Beta 3 then, please? I'd love to do a little more testing, but I need that editor somewhat fixed...
yes please... we want found the 'deepher on it' BUGS now.
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:51 pm
by Joakim Christiansen
blueznl wrote:but I need that editor somewhat fixed...
I didn't notice any errors in it, what's wrong?