Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 7:59 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by plouf.

i dont think its athlon/pentium issue
i also have athlon1800+ and the 4 its faster here too , but note that not always get the same results
some millisec differs , i guess its because apps
running in the background

Christos

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:08 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Danilo.

@Ferdinand:
> that's odd ! According to all my info Compu's got an Intel 1,6 Ghz inside of it.
> What's yours ? Have you checked it ? Maybe the store made a mistake ?

I dont exactly understand what you want to say.

I´m using old PIII-600 and dual-PIII-1000 here.
Also, i´m not buying PCs in a store... i build them
myself and use only original iNTEL "boxed" CPUs.

cya,
...Danilo

(registered PureBasic user)

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:39 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Ferdinand.

@Danilo,
I dont exactly understand what you want to say.
okay, what I meant was: if I've got an Intel, your conclusion could only mean: a) by mistake you wouldn't have an Intel (hence the questions) OR b) program number 3 running faster on mine is consequence of another factor. Obviously it's "b". It's not very important.
I didn't think my posting would result in this heated discussion ! As far as I know AMD and Intel each have their pro's and cons. But I made no study out of the matter. Intel does have a (mostly good) reputation, so that's why there's an Intel processor here.

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:42 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Ferdinand.

@fred,
Note: in the test 4, the y value isn't incremented, so it could be faster.
But in test 3 there is also no y value !? (or is there ?!? I'm not so good at assembeler...)

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 9:28 pm
by BackupUser
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Pupil.
Originally posted by Ferdinand


But in test 3 there is also no y value !? (or is there ?!? I'm not so good at assembeler...)
You have 'i' (i or y doesn't really matter) that's incremented in test 3 (i.e. for i = 0 to 100000000). But test 4 would equal (almost) this, using a for loop:
For x = 0 to 100000000
next