PureBasic Forums - English

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 10:19 am**

Fred wrote:Because '1' isn't a variable so you can't acces its field . If it's only a speed matter, we can still put PeekX() in the compiler it self to avoid an extra call..

Ony for your syntax checker

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 10:23 am**

Fred wrote:...we can still put PeekX() in the compiler it self to avoid an extra call..

PeekX()? Ok, better as nothing

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 10:27 am**

A correct and clean way to manage sequentially stored structures is to refer data using linked lists and/or pointers inside the structures.

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 10:36 am**

Psychophanta wrote:A correct and clean way to manage sequentially stored structures is to refer data using linked lists and/or pointers inside the structures.

Maybe but why should I put the screen datas on an array/linked list first?
Thats not fast and not useful in all cases....

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 10:40 am**

btw, using an extra variable pointer will hardly impact on the perfs..

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 10:44 am**

Fred wrote:btw, using an extra variable pointer will hardly impact on the perfs..

Yes. Only if I have to use one extra varaible pointer.
But is is ok for now....I will see... what the PureTeam can do for this request

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 7:07 pm**

@IceSoft:

http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... ri+pointer

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 8:15 pm**

and it's easy to use this syntax:

Code: Select all

*var.byte = @"test"

while *var\b
  debug *var\b
  *var + 1
wend

*pointers can be incremented, so there's no problem :roll:

Posted: **Fri May 05, 2006 8:43 pm**

Dräc wrote:@IceSoft:
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... ri+pointer

Yes that is the only correct working solution.
All others are not.

PureBasic Forums - English

Syntax error message: *(p+1)\v