Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:21 pm
by netmaestro
In my opinion it's rock-solid. I think it's more stable today than 3.94 was when it was released and that's really saying something. I'd compute a mission to Mars and back on it and sleep like a baby until the ship touched down gently +/- 1mm from the designated spot. (The 1mm is for pilot error. We always let 'em have a beer when they pass the moon on the way in)
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:50 pm
by srod
I've certainly pushed PB 4 as far as I ever did 3.94 and have found nothing untoward at all. It's looking pretty solid I reckon.
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 10:29 pm
by Polo
Well, the Purebasic betas are most of the time very stable, of course, maybe a bug here and there, but I'm always trusting Fred's work, it's very reliable !
You can use it without problems
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 1:16 pm
by Trond
techjunkie wrote:I wonder if Trond has answered the poll?!? :roll: I'm pretty sure what his answer would be...
I voted yes before I saw your post. Whether the programming language is stable or not is irrelevant, you should test your tool properly before distributing it, and then you should also see all defects caused by an unstable programming language.