Is PB 4.0 B11 stable enough to

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
Post Reply

Is PB 4.0 B11 stable enough to create a tool and distribute to 400 end-users?

Yes
24
83%
No
5
17%
 
Total votes: 29
User avatar
netmaestro
PureBasic Bullfrog
PureBasic Bullfrog
Posts: 8452
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada

Post by netmaestro »

In my opinion it's rock-solid. I think it's more stable today than 3.94 was when it was released and that's really saying something. I'd compute a mission to Mars and back on it and sleep like a baby until the ship touched down gently +/- 1mm from the designated spot. (The 1mm is for pilot error. We always let 'em have a beer when they pass the moon on the way in)
BERESHEIT
Top
srod
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 10589
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: Beyond the pale...

Post by srod »

I've certainly pushed PB 4 as far as I ever did 3.94 and have found nothing untoward at all. It's looking pretty solid I reckon. :D
I may look like a mule, but I'm not a complete ass.
Top
Polo
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: UK

Post by Polo »

Well, the Purebasic betas are most of the time very stable, of course, maybe a bug here and there, but I'm always trusting Fred's work, it's very reliable !
You can use it without problems ;)
Top
Trond
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 7446
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:45 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Trond »

techjunkie wrote:I wonder if Trond has answered the poll?!? :roll: I'm pretty sure what his answer would be... :lol: :lol:
I voted yes before I saw your post. Whether the programming language is stable or not is irrelevant, you should test your tool properly before distributing it, and then you should also see all defects caused by an unstable programming language.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic”