Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:40 pm
by Killswitch
I've updated the compiler a little bit, but contray to my previous promise I haven't thought of a new name. :(. Any suggestions?

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:44 pm
by Inf0Byt3
Very nice. About the name, I have no idea :roll: ...

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:47 pm
by Shannara
Could call it ... Pure :D

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:30 am
by blueznl
filthy?
unpure? <-- actually i'm planning to use this one for another little pet project
sillog?

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:43 am
by Killswitch
What the hell does sillog mean?

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:45 am
by blueznl
SILly LOGic :-)

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:34 pm
by Killswitch
[double post, see below]

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:35 pm
by Killswitch
Ah! Thanks.

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:44 pm
by Shannara
Impure? Crystalis? Switch?

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:26 pm
by Killswitch
Switch? Now that sounds well cool :roll:

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:10 pm
by Shannara
Hehe, dont like it :) Why is it in your name?

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:58 pm
by Killswitch
Is that 'why, is "switch" in your name?' or 'why is the word "switch" in your name?

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:44 pm
by traumatic
Killswitch, call it "engage" ;)

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:52 am
by Xombie
Maybe you should ask yourself what the goal of your compiler is. That might give a clue as to a good name. Consider like fred - "Pure"Basic. A language that is clear of any excess complexity. If you want to code something basic, it takes a minimum of effort and the code generated is clean and small. So... what's your goal with yours?