PureBasic Forums - English

we're not funny! we're all serious, very serious! just not always, euh, good, correct, accurate, fast, intelligent, listeners, or good coders...

of course excluding the pb team... well... some of them <-- would that spark a little debate?

I haven't seen anyone post a convincing reason why EXP() should be omitted from the language. Name a language in widespread use which doesn't have EXP().

chris319 wrote:I haven't seen anyone post a convincing reason why EXP() should be omitted from the language. Name a language in widespread use which doesn't have EXP().

I've never heard of Exp(), is that good enough?

Trond wrote:

chris319 wrote:I haven't seen anyone post a convincing reason why EXP() should be omitted from the language. Name a language in widespread use which doesn't have EXP().

I've never heard of Exp(), is that good enough?

LOL!!! That's the funniest thing I've read in a long time! What better reason to leave it out of the languge? I pray that you've heard of LOG(), ABS() and a number of trig functions.

chris319 wrote:

Trond wrote:

chris319 wrote:I haven't seen anyone post a convincing reason why EXP() should be omitted from the language. Name a language in widespread use which doesn't have EXP().

I've never heard of Exp(), is that good enough?

LOL!!! That's the funniest thing I've read in a long time! What better reason to leave it out of the languge? I pray that you've heard of LOG(), ABS() and a number of trig functions.

Yes of course.