Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:21 pm
But you didn't use PB you used ASMPsychophanta wrote:However, good news to know PB is so fast
PureBasic Forums - English
http://www.purebasic.com
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/
Fastest way to wrap angle values (ASM)
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:31 pm
Well, i hope there is no speed difference between ASM and PB4.0Final.
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:37 pm
Hey Psychophanta,
Always nice to see more assembly functions from you. Thanks man! Perhaps you would have the time to comment each line for us learning ASM on the PC? I've done very little ASM on the PC and am making the leap from my old 6502 experiences. I get to skip all that 16 bit crap!
BTW I get : 250,270,271,260, 521 and I'm using an AMD Athlon XP 2400.
Always nice to see more assembly functions from you. Thanks man! Perhaps you would have the time to comment each line for us learning ASM on the PC? I've done very little ASM on the PC and am making the leap from my old 6502 experiences. I get to skip all that 16 bit crap!
BTW I get : 250,270,271,260, 521 and I'm using an AMD Athlon XP 2400.
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:32 pm
Hi, thanx!
Updated to 4.0B7 and commented.
But i warn: it is easier to understand without comments!!
Updated to 4.0B7 and commented.
But i warn: it is easier to understand without comments!!
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 4:01 am
Wow, I see what you mean!
Again, thanks for the effort.
Again, thanks for the effort.