Page 2 of 3

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:59 pm
by dagcrack
lol...

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 11:36 pm
by blueznl
3.94 is pretty good, 4.xx should be awesome, let's give fred the time to do what he has to do, if it takes him a few months more, i expect it to be worth it...

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:03 am
by PB
> Short term was listed as 2005/2006, so it would appear he has another 13 months :)

Not exactly... Fred said v4 for Windows should be before the end of 2005,
which is part of the phrase "short term 2005/2006". The rest of 2005/2006
is for Linux and other work. :)

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:06 am
by rsts
PB wrote:> Short term was listed as 2005/2006, so it would appear he has another 13 months :)

Not exactly... Fred said v4 for Windows should be before the end of 2005,
which is part of the phrase "short term 2005/2006". The rest of 2005/2006
is for Linux and other work. :)
Sorry - the quote I read was "Short-term: release the v4 for Windows, probably before the end of the year. " - where the year wasn't specifically mentioned.

cheers

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:13 am
by PB
> "probably before the end of the year. " - where the year wasn't specifically mentioned

Oh, hehehe... but I think we both know what year he meant, otherwise he
would have said "before the end of next year". :)

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:15 am
by blueznl
ok, let me become a lawyer, anyone knows the meaning of the word 'probable'?

now let's get of the guys back and instead hurt him with countless suggestions and requests to make pb even better! :-)

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:26 am
by rsts
PB wrote:> "probably before the end of the year. " - where the year wasn't specifically mentioned

Oh, hehehe... but I think we both know what year he meant, otherwise he
would have said "before the end of next year". :)
But since I don't know, that would be an assumption and you know what happens when we assume.

:lol:

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:40 am
by PB
Stop it, you're starting to scare me! :)

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:57 am
by rsts
OK - I'm done.

I think we all know my position is for Fred to take whatever time he needs to "do it right".

I prefer schedule slip rather than quality.

cheers

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:01 am
by Dare2
:!: Ship early, ship often :!:


(Just stirring)

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:57 am
by blueznl
i prefer my code shaken, not stirred

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:34 am
by Dare2
:D

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:32 pm
by remi_meier
@Trond:
Wie have the 'Debug' keyword (and most likely the API) :P

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:20 pm
by Trond
remi_meier wrote:@Trond:
Wie have the 'Debug' keyword (and most likely the API) :P
What did you think the debugging functions were stored in? :wink:

Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:33 pm
by remi_meier
:lol:
You know what I mean! The debugger-lib isn't a normal lib in the PureLibraries
folder. It belongs to the compiler, but all the libraries in PureLibraries\ are
extensions of the raw compiler.
But we could also test programs without ANY output:

Code: Select all

a = 5
b = a * 4
while a = 20
wend
So if you aren't lazy, you really don't need any lib :D