Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:54 pm
by blueznl
traumatics, you're right, every image is converted into the same depth as the screen (a kind of behaviour i do *not* appreciate, to be honest...)

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 2:38 am
by Amiga5k
It may be bothersome, but it is almost certainly required if you want any kind of performance to speak of: Imagine if PB had to convert each and every operation 'on the fly' to match the true depth (It would be very slow indeed).

Honestly, this is exactly what I would expect it would do.

Russell