Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 8:02 am
by gilles_k
I like it.
48 fps 100000 dots any resolution.
390 fps 10000 dots any resolution.
750 fps 1000 dots any resolution.
And just for the fun 5 fps 1000000 dots any resolution.
Specs : P4 3.06 HT + GeForce 6800 Ultra.
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 5:41 pm
by Thomas
griz wrote:The graphics card is not so important because the program does not use 3D functions.
I was getting about 26 fps with an Athlon XP 2400 ... only 1 fps slower than your XP 3000. I wonder if graphics card performance does play more of a role? Clearing the screen and painting pixels may be plain faster on some graphics cards. I've got a Radeon 9700 non pro in this machine, what kind of a graphics card are you using? In the (latest) final version of your program (posted above) I get 41 fps.
I'm getting 44 fps with a Radeon 9800 non pro.
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:18 pm
by Kale
61 fps 100000 dots any resolution. See sig for cpu, etc...
Awesome
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:37 am
by sk8terboi
I think it is very awesome! Great job! How long did it take you to make??? I imagine a long time! 
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:43 am
by NoahPhense
That's sweet..
good job
- np
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:59 am
by blueznl
14 fps (not very good is it?) and a very annoying flickering titlebar on 3.93 latest updated libs
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:15 am
by NoahPhense
blueznl wrote:14 fps (not very good is it?) and a very annoying flickering titlebar on 3.93 latest updated libs
True. But I figured someone would have fixed that.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:01 pm
by blueznl
turned out to be 16 fps, had something running in the background, a rather disappointing score for an amd64-3000, i think this motherboard asus k8n-e deluxe sux...
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:33 pm
by Derek
I'm getting 41 fps with an AMD643000 on an asus K8V motherboard. Got an old Nvidia Ti4600 graphics board and 1 gig of pc333 memory.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 7:10 pm
by blueznl
ooops, left debugger on, it's 38 fps here
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 12:00 am
by Jimbo_H
griz wrote:The graphics card is not so important because the program does not use 3D functions.
I was getting about 26 fps with an Athlon XP 2400 ... only 1 fps slower than your XP 3000. I wonder if graphics card performance does play more of a role? Clearing the screen and painting pixels may be plain faster on some graphics cards. I've got a Radeon 9700 non pro in this machine, what kind of a graphics card are you using? In the (latest) final version of your program (posted above) I get 41 fps.
I get 41 fps on my pooter (spec in my sig) with the "final" version with 500Mb RAM already used by my open programs. Will try with a compiled version and nothing open later to see if it's any quicker
Amazing demo by the way, beautifully done and shows off PB very well
Jim