Wishlist for PB 7.0 :)

[Matheos]

Hello. I understand that my request isn't very interesting to many and will likely not be implemented, but I'm asking for the ability for EditorGadget to limit string length, like StringGadget does with the #PB_String_MaximumLength flag. However, I'd like this to also work with the #PB_Editor_WordWrap flag.Thank you.

I agree, it's a reasonable request — PB would benefit from real-world application features such as this.

It would be worthwhile to be able to set maximum lines, in addition to maximum characters per line, via SetGadgetAttribute() rather than using workarounds.

[miso]

Zlib inflate deflate for streams natively, without linking the lib.

[ZX80]

It would be worthwhile to be able to set maximum lines, in addition to maximum characters per line, via SetGadgetAttribute() rather than using workarounds.

Good time, Matheos.

Also I was just thinking of suggesting the following: create an array or string that will contain the allowed characters. For StringGadget() and EditorGadget() add an additional parameter, where the array with allowed characters that we created earlier [optional]. If array is not specified, all characters are allowed. Yes, I understand that all of this can be implemented through a callback function, but if it were native, it would be certainly much more convenient.

[threedslider]

Zlib inflate deflate for streams natively, without linking the lib.

+100 !

[jacdelad]

PackerCallback() to be threadsafe (if performing multiple packing operations, how do I identify them?) and to be available for unpacking.

[minimy]

I think will be nice an encoder for GIF.

[jacdelad]

#PB_ListIcon_NoHeaders to be available in the dialog library. But maybe this can be done earlier.

[Klangtaucher]

x^y instead of Pow(x, y)

[threedslider]

x^y instead of Pow(x, y)

x^y is a xor thing so you need to use Pow() function with power calculation

By the way, Welcome to the forum here

[Drone]

x^y instead of Pow(x, y)

x^y is a xor thing so you need to use Pow() function with power calculation

By the way, Welcome to the forum here

No
! = Bitwise XOR
XOR = Logical XOR

[threedslider]

No
! = Bitwise XOR
XOR = Logical XOR

Again nope, sorry

! = it is a logical NOT (not to be confused with : ~ = bitwise NOT) (doesn't work with PB)
^ = it is a bitwise XOR (exclusive OR) (doesn't work in PB)

XOR in PB is a logical XOR and only work that and other NOT in PB too

See that in this link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operations_in_C

[ar-s]

A simple usemp3encoder/decoder. Lot's of web radio still using mp3 and mp3 is free since a long time. That could be cool to not need to use Fmodex.

[STARGÅTE]

No
! = Bitwise XOR
XOR = Logical XOR

Again nope, sorry

! = it is a logical NOT (not to be confused with : ~ = bitwise NOT) (doesn't work with PB)
^ = it is a bitwise XOR (exclusive OR) (doesn't work in PB)

XOR in PB is a logical XOR and only work that and other NOT in PB too

See that in this link : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operations_in_C

Why you say no?
! is the bit-wise XOR operator in Pure Basic.
The ^ character has no meaning up to now.

https://www.purebasic.com/documentation ... ables.html

[threedslider]

Why you say no?
! is the bit-wise XOR operator in Pure Basic.
The ^ character has no meaning up to now.

https://www.purebasic.com/documentation ... ables.html

Oops ! Sorry I was thinking in C programming not PB
Yeah... ! is a bitwise XOR in PB, you are right it, that confuse me

[miso]

I wish if project files could be sorted and/or manually reordered in IDE Project Info tab.