Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting dlls?

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
User avatar
Primoz128
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Slovenia

Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting dlls?

Post by Primoz128 »

Well im no coder... im just a mess around, dude with really low amount of possible focus/concentration time on a thing, and i love Game Maker and i want to add functionality to it, i almost bought PB on last moday, visa gave me major problem in buying it, and well now i just want opinion from you guys that do a lot in PB.
rsts
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2736
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:39 am
Location: Southwest OH - USA

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by rsts »

You've been around here for over a year and don't know?

Go somewhere else and troll.
User avatar
Primoz128
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by Primoz128 »

WTF ?
Am i trolling ? NO, and being over a year registered doesn't mean anything you weirdo.
User avatar
Tenaja
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:15 pm

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by Tenaja »

PureBasic is the best cross-platform basic compiler that money can buy. Either buy it, or go use some open source stuff.
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4318
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by skywalk »

Send Fred a private message. Ordering 1 license of PureBasic is not that hard. :shock:

Think about what you are asking?
If you use another development language, but still want to create dll's in PureBasic, what is stopping you from writing them in the other tool?
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
User avatar
Primoz128
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by Primoz128 »

That tool costs real bucks dude... and no i don't wana contact Fred, he hates me <.<, but some other guy already offered so i will do it withing next week, maximum.
rsts
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2736
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:39 am
Location: Southwest OH - USA

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by rsts »

Primoz128 wrote:WTF ?
Am i trolling ? NO, and being over a year registered doesn't mean anything you weirdo.
You've been trolling ever since you joined. You've yet to make a meaningful post. Most are to satisfy your own ego or an attempt to stir something up.

Try another basic forum, or maybe grow up.
User avatar
Primoz128
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by Primoz128 »

rsts wrote:
Primoz128 wrote:WTF ?
Am i trolling ? NO, and being over a year registered doesn't mean anything you weirdo.
You've been trolling ever since you joined. You've yet to make a meaningful post. Most are to satisfy your own ego or an attempt to stir something up.

Try another basic forum, or maybe grow up.
What ?
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4318
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by skywalk »

Nobody hates their potential customer :(
Yes, the RealBasic thread you opened was locked and I cannot comment on that.
But here, you answered your own question...RealBasic costs much much more than PureBasic.
It's up to you to determine why.
This forum is largely for coders who have already chosen PureBasic or are seriously considering it.
You seem to be taking much longer than most to decide :wink:
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
User avatar
Primoz128
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by Primoz128 »

Ye well i tried dozens and dozens of languages, im just extremely picky about this, i just like messing around with stuff, but now i need something for the role of extending GM.
Thanks for your opinions.

About RB thread... i was in a hurry... was just blabing about.
User avatar
TI-994A
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:47 am
Location: Singapore
Contact:

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by TI-994A »

Hi Primoz128. Most of these development tools have trial versions that are fully functional, more or less. It would be best to give them a try before you can really make any decisions. From your posts, it seems that you may be more inclined towards Rapid Application Development (RAD) tools, but these usually have some trade-offs. For one, they're usually pricier, and for another, they don't usually produce optimised code. The compiled executables tend to be quite bloated, and they require one or more dependables to function. Furthermore, RAD tools tend to be more limited in their functionalities and have much less flexibility.

It's no use to try and sell the power of PureBasic to you if it doesn't suit your needs. Although it can also be considered a RAD tool with its Visual Designer, PureBasic is still a code-oriented language, albeit one with great flexibility and virtually limitless potential, producing fast and small executables. Plus, it's cross-platform and highly affordable.

In my opinion, it's easily one of the best development tools available today. But like I said, you'll have to find the one that suits you.
Texas Instruments TI-99/4A Home Computer: the first home computer with a 16bit processor, crammed into an 8bit architecture. Great hardware - Poor design - Wonderful BASIC engine. And it could talk too! Please visit my YouTube Channel :D
User avatar
Primoz128
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by Primoz128 »

I know that PB is amazing, ill let the time tell what i prefer better.
Not all RAD tools need dependencies from windows... i think that's what you said, this one tends to be large in filesize so that it carries everything it needs with it.

You know what ? Im very interested how many copies of PB Fred has sold in total...
User avatar
Kukulkan
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1422
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:35 pm
Location: germany
Contact:

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by Kukulkan »

As far as you are respecting the rules for compiling DLL's with PureBasic (http://www.purebasic.com/faq.php, 6th point), you can do very good DLL's. We are using it for our SDK (some crypto and networking service) and we compile the source to .dll, .so and .dylib. Obviously we need some CompilerIf stuff to handle the OS differences but it works great and DLL compiling with PureBasic is easy.

Kukulkan
User avatar
Primoz128
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by Primoz128 »

Such answers i need ^^.
User avatar
electrochrisso
Addict
Addict
Posts: 989
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 2:13 am
Location: Darling River

Re: Would it be a good idea to have PB solely for writting d

Post by electrochrisso »

Not sure what your situation is Primoz128, but at 79eur, PB seems Fn good value to me, PM me if you need assistance to purchase your own license.
PureBasic! Purely the best 8)
Post Reply