A box has 3 dimensions not 2
Yes, a significant change.
Many codes to be changed.
But it makes sense (at least for me)
Maybe at a major release number change (5 to 6)
Bernd
Box() should be renamed to Rectangle()
Box() should be renamed to Rectangle()
Since PB has more and more 3D commands, Box() should be renamed to Rectangle().
A box has 3 dimensions not 2
Yes, a significant change.
Many codes to be changed.
But it makes sense (at least for me)
Maybe at a major release number change (5 to 6)
Bernd
A box has 3 dimensions not 2
Yes, a significant change.
Many codes to be changed.
But it makes sense (at least for me)
Maybe at a major release number change (5 to 6)
Bernd
-
IdeasVacuum
- Always Here
- Posts: 6426
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:33 am
- Location: Wales, UK
- Contact:
Re: Box() should be renamed to Rectangle()
Couldn't the 3D version simply be named Box3d()? That would prevent existing code being broken?
IdeasVacuum
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
-
DarkDragon
- Addict
- Posts: 2344
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Box() should be renamed to Rectangle()
Yes a lot of work to change all my work.Since PB has more and more 3D commands, Box() should be renamed to Rectangle().
A box has 3 dimensions not 2
Yes, a significant change.
Many codes to be changed.
But it makes sense (at least for me)
Maybe at a major release number change (5 to 6)
Bernd
But, you are write, Rectangle() is a good 2D drawing solution for me.
And Box() for 3D drawing.
Marc,
- every professional was once an amateur - greetings from Pajottenland - Belgium -
PS: sorry for my english I speak flemish ...
PS: sorry for my english I speak flemish ...