Make startposition optional in FindString()

PB · Post by PB » Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:30 am

Oops, I don't know why I thought it would break existing code. I'm going so stupid. Forgive my post.

Demivec · Post by **Demivec** » Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:48 pm

AND51 wrote:—1

Why all the +1's ... ? I thought you want to omit the ,1 so actually you all should write -1 in this thread, shouldn't you?

Whether you use -1 or +1, both equate to TRUE.

Post by **freak** » Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:51 pm

This is one of the more entertaining feature requests i have to tell you

(Especially considering it has already been implemented. But don't tell anyone!

)

Demivec · Post by **Demivec** » Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:05 pm

freak wrote:This is one of the more entertaining feature requests i have to tell you

(Especially considering it has already been implemented. But don't tell anyone! )

Glad to hear it.

skywalk · Post by **skywalk** » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:30 pm

Demivec wrote:Whether you use -1 or +1, both equate to TRUE.

And don't forget "0"

AND51 · Post by **AND51** » Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:54 pm

So true, skwalk...

PureBasic Forums - English

Make startposition optional in FindString()

Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()

Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()

Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()

Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()

Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()

Re: Make startposition optional in FindString()