Constructive criticism maybe?

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
Tipperton
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:55 pm

Post by Tipperton »

srod wrote:
...he's currently serving a 30 year sentence for a sex crime involving a child (under 12 years old)
He'd be out in a few years for that over here! Even our killers who get life will nevertheless be out free walking the streets within twenty years or so!
Not so in Florida, at least not for sex crimes. In Florida if you're convicted of a sex crime you *WILL* serve the entire length of your sentance. There is no gain time for working, good behavior, ect.

Personally I think it should be that way for all felonies and it should be a federal law and not just a state or local law.
netmaestro wrote:Wow Tipperton that's a lot to pay for smokes. We live within 20 miles of several First Nations reserves and they sell tax-free smokes for four bucks a pack. That's top quality, if you want cheap ones they can be had for a buck and a half.
Yeah, I live in Cook county which has the dubious distinction of having the highest cigarette use tax rates in the country. I believe it also has the highest sales tax rates too. For sales tax, I buy major purchases like the 46 inch Samsung TV I just got on line. In fact I do most of my purchasing on line through Amazon.com as a member of Amazon Prime.

But cost was one of the many motivations to quit. But back when I was smoking I didn't have easy access to the reservations (can't drive because of poor 20/60 vision). Many of the reservations run web sites where you can buy tax free cigarettes, but the government subpeanas their records and sends tax bills to everyone that ordered from them. So the only way to do it is in person and in cash which I couldn't do. Oh well, cost is/was one of the better reasons to quit anyway.
User avatar
the.weavster
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1576
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 6:53 pm
Location: England

Post by the.weavster »

Tipperton wrote:I pretty sure I done that to you at least once in our rather heated debates about piracy.
As I recall you were the only one who got heated not SFSxOI, then you threw your rattle out of your pram when another op (I think it was Paul) very politely asked you to cool your jets.


Tipperton wrote:Too true, I once had (please note the past tense here) a friend who thought that when he bought a piece of software, a book, some music, a movie, that it was his and he had the right to copy it as much as he wanted and to do whatever he wanted with those copies from giving them away to selling them.

Needless to say that after he made that pronouncement, I dropped him as a friend and someone I associated with like a red hot potato.
Tipperton wrote:But back when I was smoking I didn't have easy access to the reservations (can't drive because of poor 20/60 vision). Many of the reservations run web sites where you can buy tax free cigarettes, but the government subpeanas their records and sends tax bills to everyone that ordered from them. So the only way to do it is in person and in cash which I couldn't do.
Of course these things are beyond the comprehension of an unprincipled heathen such as myself but I have to confess I'm surprised to find tax evasion is acceptable to you when piracy isn't.
Tipperton
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:55 pm

Post by Tipperton »

the.weavster wrote:As I recall you were the only one who got heated not SFSxOI, then you threw your rattle out of your pram when another op (I think it was Paul) very politely asked you to cool your jets.
STFU, I wasn't talking to you.
the.weavster wrote:Of course these things are beyond the comprehension of an unprincipled heathen such as myself but I have to confess I'm surprised to find tax evasion is acceptable to you when piracy isn't.
You are wrong again. It would be totally legal for me to go to a reservation and buy tax free cigarettes for my own personal use. However the county has no way a knowing if cigarettes being shipped in from these web sites are for personal use or for resale so they impose taxed on all shipments into to the county.
User avatar
the.weavster
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1576
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 6:53 pm
Location: England

Post by the.weavster »

Tipperton wrote:STFU, I wasn't talking to you.
There you go again, another little hissy fit.
Tipperton wrote:You are wrong again.
Fortunately being wrong isn't a big issue for me because I don't assume an air of infallibility and berate people who disagree with me.
Tipperton wrote:However the county has no way a knowing if cigarettes being shipped in from these web sites are for personal use or for resale so they impose taxed on all shipments into to the county.
They have no way of knowing cigarettes bought in person for cash are for personal use either, in fact that is how I'd do it if I were going to sell them on.
User avatar
pdwyer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2813
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Chiba, Japan

Post by pdwyer »

LOL :lol:

Even a thread called "Constructive criticism maybe?" is turning into a fame thread !
Paul Dwyer

“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
naw
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:57 pm

Post by naw »

@pdwyer et al

ROFL - weavster presses buttons, tiperton responds - it's almost a mechanical action / re-action thing - c'mon guys...

At the risk of going back on topic ;-) I wonder how the last few posts could have been re-phrased as a *working example* of constructive criticism...

BTW - love Mrs SFSxOI's 'Pod People' analogy - can imagine this becoming an accepted term for people who spend too much time online and plugged in to gadgets
Ta - N
User avatar
pdwyer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2813
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Chiba, Japan

Post by pdwyer »

:D now we wait for the, "He started it!", "No, You called me a @#$$ first and I just responded", "No but in the other thread you called me a #$%#$ before that!" ...

:lol:
Paul Dwyer

“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
SFSxOI
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2970
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Where ya would never look.....

Post by SFSxOI »

Tipperton wrote:
the.weavster wrote:As I recall you were the only one who got heated not SFSxOI, then you threw your rattle out of your pram when another op (I think it was Paul) very politely asked you to cool your jets.
STFU, I wasn't talking to you.
the.weavster wrote:Of course these things are beyond the comprehension of an unprincipled heathen such as myself but I have to confess I'm surprised to find tax evasion is acceptable to you when piracy isn't.
You are wrong again. It would be totally legal for me to go to a reservation and buy tax free cigarettes for my own personal use. However the county has no way a knowing if cigarettes being shipped in from these web sites are for personal use or for resale so they impose taxed on all shipments into to the county.
I assume your talking about the Indian Reservation. It may be perfectly legal for you to go to the reservation to buy tax free cigarettes for personal use. But having had a lot of experience myself with states laws and reservations I can gurantee you 100% that the tax free part was only really ever intended for residents of the reservation and if you bring a tax free item from the reservation into the state that it becomes subject to state tax (or in some cases local or county tax). As long as it remains on the reservation its not subject to state tax, but once you cross into the state it is, there may also be local or county taxes imposed. And thats 100% fact in all 50 states in the U.S., its (federally) part of whats called States Rights which gives states the authority to levy tax on all items crossing their borders which are bound for use or consumption in the state and its also codified somewhere in the tax laws for all 50 states. The rule of thumb is - if its taxed when you buy it in the state then its subject to tax if you bring it from the reservation into the state. It may or may not be enforced, but its still subject, and even if exempted it does not mean that its not still taxable and all exemption means is that they choose not to enforce it at that time (or period of time). So yes, you did evade the tax laws plain and simple regardless of how much you want to believe otherwise.

And yes you did cross state borders. An indian reservation is basically a sovereign nation/state within the confines of U.S. territory on federal land granted to the tribe for that use where the U.S. government has concurrent jurisdisction. Simply because this land is also located in a state does not mean its state land or part of the state. When you enter the reservation you are leaving the state and crossing the borders of the reservation. When you leave the reservation you are crossing the borders of the state.

There is more money lost in tax revenue every year in the U.S. alone by actions such as yours then software/music/movie pirates could ever cause if every single piece of software, movie, or music, produced for the next 200 years were pirated. Need a mental picture comparison? Look at it this way, all piracy/infringment would be a new born baby flea on a dog, and your tax evaison actions combined with all the others would be the whole dog.

The difference between the two?

When tax money is collected its used for society benefit as a whole (police, fire, education, etc...), when the money is not collected then society as a whole suffers and does without. You and I and our families lose (we dont get that much needed increase in police protection, or that new fire station or equipment, or those books the schools need, etc...).

If money from piracy is collected it goes into the pockets of big content and if its not collected they do a tax write off and still get it back in tax breaks and never lose anything, and at any rate they write off things in taxes every year that would have already paid for the economic mess we are in now at least 10 times when all of big content is considered a whole (major software/movie/music). Then on top of that these industries want the governemnet to expend billions over years to combat piracy when what they should be combatting other things.

And all the rabid anti-piracy freaks are cheering them on without giving any consideration at all to whats really happening. All you have to do is ask yourself two questions, "How much of what big content collects from persecuting piracy do i get? and "How much do I benefit from having the things that tax dollars pays for? - just those two questions and anyone can answer the question their self as to where the priority should lie. No, piracy is not harming the economy, tax evaision and about a hundred other different things are. Piracy doesn't harm the economy because society as a whole would not and will not see a penny of that money because big content writes it off in taxes each year or takes advantage of tax breaks and loop holes we as normal mortal humans don't have available to us.

I'm not condoning piracy, but i think our priority should lie elsewhere, and one of them should be to put focus where its needed instead of lining the pockets of big content.

The harm comes from people who did the very thing you did. So have you decided if your going to be friends with your self anymore?

Sooo...persecute tax evaders or persecute pirates? Hmmm...lets see - evaders or pirates...hmmm I choose tax evaders. Selecting the correct priority set in life is important, and you gave away a friendship for nothing.

Now, doesn't knowing that you rank higher on the harm scale then pirates make you want a cigarette? :)
Last edited by SFSxOI on Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Tipperton
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:55 pm

Post by Tipperton »

naw wrote:ROFL - weavster presses buttons, tiperton responds - it's almost a mechanical action / re-action thing - c'mon guys...
Yeah :( And the.weavester apparently likes pushing peoples buttons. Do you know what we call people like that? Bullies. I've had enough of bullies to fill several lifetimes. This forum may not have an ignore feature but I can certainly ignore him, he's not worth the aggravation.
pdwyer wrote:Even a thread called "Constructive criticism maybe?" is turning into a fame thread !
That's because the.weavster isn't interested in constructive criticism or contributing constructively to this thread. Notice that his first message promotes doing physical violence on people which is never an answer to anything. And his second message was purely to throw insults.

Both are common activities of bullies or forum trolls, they're only interested in starting flame wars.
the.weavster wrote:
Tipperton wrote:STFU, I wasn't talking to you.
There you go again, another little hissy fit.
Well how do expect people to react when you insult them? With kindness? Get real!
the.weavster wrote:I don't assume an air of infallibility and berate people who disagree with me.
Nor do I unless the person I'm talking to decides to defend his position with insults as is your habit, then I tend to treat that person as he has shown to all how he wants to be treated.
SFSxOI wrote:It may be perfectly legal for you to go to the reservation to buy tax free cigarettes for personal use. But having had a lot of experience myself with states laws and reservations I can gurantee you 100% that the tax free part was only really ever intended for residents of the reservation
All that may be true, and if so, why do none of the states or counties even try to make an effort to prevent people not living on the reservation from buying the cigarettes, why do they allow the reservations to even sell them. And if the reservations are sovereign countries them selves.
SFSxOI wrote:Now, doesn't knowing that you evaded tax laws intentionally and rank higher on the harm scale then pirates make you want a cigarette? :)
Speaking of harm done, I used to find these forums a pleasant place to visit but now I them about as hostile as any other forum on the Internet. Especially with some members throwing insults and other members approving.

I can no longer recommend the PureBasic community to anyone and unfortunately that also means PureBasic too. I've quit using it any way in favor of something far superior.

Now doesn't the harm you've done to PureBasic and it's community make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
User avatar
blueb
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:15 pm
Location: Cuernavaca, Mexico

Post by blueb »

SFSxOI wrote:... I've quit using it any way in favor of something far superior.
Now we know you're lying... nothing's "far" superior to PureBasic! Period.

But O.K. please tell us.. what's the name of this mythical language?

--blueb
- It was too lonely at the top.

System : PB 6.21(x64) and Win 11 Pro (x64)
Hardware: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X w/64 gigs Ram, AMD RX 6950 XT Graphics w/16gigs Mem
SFSxOI
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2970
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Where ya would never look.....

Post by SFSxOI »

Tipperton wrote:
SFSxOI wrote:It may be perfectly legal for you to go to the reservation to buy tax free cigarettes for personal use. But having had a lot of experience myself with states laws and reservations I can gurantee you 100% that the tax free part was only really ever intended for residents of the reservation
All that may be true, and if so, why do none of the states or counties even try to make an effort to prevent people not living on the reservation from buying the cigarettes, why do they allow the reservations to even sell them. And if the reservations are sovereign countries them selves.

Now doesn't the harm you've done to PureBasic and it's community make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
they don't make the effort because they don't have jurisdiction. As I stated above

"An indian reservation is basically a sovereign nation/state within the confines of U.S. territory on federal land granted to the tribe for that use where the U.S. government has concurrent jurisdisction. Simply because this land is also located in a state does not mean its state land or part of the state. When you enter the reservation you are leaving the state and crossing the borders of the reservation. When you leave the reservation you are crossing the borders of the state. "

States don't have jurisdiction in another state or country or on federal land for preventing those things. So when a person crosses the reservation boundry they are no longer in the state and the state looses jurisdiction over them, and since the state does not have jurisdiction on the reservation they can't prevent the sale from happening on the reservation, which is part of the reason why when you cross back into the state those things become subject to tax. When you enter an Indian Reservation there is a sign somewhere that tells you your entering. Thats why, I thought it obvious. DuH!

Also, remember this...when its all said and done that ex-friend of yours that you dumped would probably still like to be your friend and not expect anything from you except that priceless gift of friendship - on the other hand big content will still charge you for something and still take your money despite you being a part of their anti-piracy cheering section and thus your relationship with big content is only as good as the money you give them for only as long as you have money to give them just like a hooker.

Harm? What harm? Pointing out the obvious is not harm. This is a Constructive criticism thread after all.
Last edited by SFSxOI on Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
SFSxOI
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2970
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Where ya would never look.....

Post by SFSxOI »

blueb wrote:
SFSxOI wrote:... I've quit using it any way in favor of something far superior.
Now we know you're lying... nothing's "far" superior to PureBasic! Period.

But O.K. please tell us.. what's the name of this mythical language?

--blueb
uhhhh...blueb, I didn't say that...Tipperton did.
User avatar
pdwyer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2813
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Chiba, Japan

Post by pdwyer »

I can feel a "Goodbye Cruel World" post coming :roll:

Don't worry, be happy. just let it go ! 8)

Tipperton, Don't let people get to you so much, you basically hand weavster a remote control with "Tipperton's Mood Control" written on it and let him press the "Bad Mood" button as much as he likes. If you want to give him that control, fine but there's nothing to be gained.

Maybe you wanna try getting rid of those big buttons so people can't push them all the time, they just bring you down, but they are yours to control
Paul Dwyer

“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
srod
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 10589
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: Beyond the pale...

Post by srod »

I can't see as any harm has been done. Those who want to have a good old argument have always been free to get on with it and the rest of us can just sit back and enjoy the show! :)

Anyone who thinks the odd argument here or there or even the swinging of handbags reflects poorly on the PB community at large is kidding themselves really. If one member flames another or resorts to insults and threats then not even that can be regarded as being representative of the community at large.

Why, if I was to jump up on a table and wave my bare butt in insult towards Fangbeast, then surely I couldn't consider all members of this forum to be quite as crass and offensive as myself? Well, except for the rest of those Aussies maybe! :twisted:

I remember the days when any insult aimed my way would be met with a robust challenge to a fight behind the bike sheds for immediate reparations. Aye, those were the days they were! I'd get the s*it kicked out of me and then end up best buddies with the lad who had just used my head as a toilet brush!

As the Irish would say - "t'was all in good fun!"

(Bloody stupid Irish - no wonder they drink so much! :wink: )
I may look like a mule, but I'm not a complete ass.
Tipperton
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:55 pm

Post by Tipperton »

blueb wrote:But O.K. please tell us.. what's the name of this mythical language?
C and C++ can do things PureBasic can't touch without huge blocks of complex code. I've moved all my development efforts there.
pdwyer wrote:I can feel a "Goodbye Cruel World" post coming :roll:
No, not a cruel world? A croel purebasic community? Yes.
srod wrote:As the Irish would say - "t'was all in good fun!"
Except that for some it isn't in fun, and the ones approving of him doesn't help the situation any.

As said before, the.weavster isn't interested in constructive criticism, he's only interested in being a bully or a forum troll. And all SFSx01 is interested in is promoting his campaign of hate against what he calls "big content" and he doesn't care who he steps on towards that goal.

No, I can honestly say that like so many other internet forums, the PureBasic forum is proving itself to not be immune to the "pod people" syndrome of people generally being rude to other other people because of anonymity. Sad to see it happen but not entirely unexpected either.
Post Reply