I don't know where you get that idea, there was no personal attack in that message. Or do you only read what you want to read just to suit your own wishes, for example:UserOfPure wrote:And yet you personally attack me by stating I have a tight asshole:
That is totally wrong and unfair! You intentionally took those words completely out of context just so you could say I personally attacked you, in their proper context as I had originally posted them there is no personal attack at all!UserOfPure wrote:Wow, talk about hyprocrisy! :roll:Tipperton wrote:you're one of those people who are so tight and cheap that you squeak when you walk.
That's not what you said in your post, you said, and I quote:UserOfPure wrote:But why come here and try to shame others (your words!) into doing the same? As srod said, others may not be able to afford it. I can't.
which doesn't mean can't it means you specifically choose not to. There is a big difference between not being able to and choosing not to.UserOfPure wrote:users like myself who don't wish to donate?
On top of that maw also said that his urging people to donate didn't include those who can't afford it, or is that just another one of those phrases you chose to ignore because it would make your message meaningless?
If you really can't afford to donate, I can accept that because I've been there too. It's not fun, but except for the very few fortunate ones, everybody experiences those problems at some time in their lives.