UseJPEG2000ImageDecoder() ?

Just starting out? Need help? Post your questions and find answers here.
Derek
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 12:51 am
Location: England

UseJPEG2000ImageDecoder() ?

Post by Derek »

Is this new, I haven't noticed it before.

If it is then what is the difference between this and UseJPEGImageDecoder()?

Edit. just tried loading a jpeg with this decoder and it didn't work so maybe it isn't a substitute for usejpegimagedecoder().
spike0314
User
User
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:28 pm

Post by spike0314 »

jpg2000 is a different file formats (*.jp2, *.j2c, *.j2k,*.jpc,*.jpx)
Derek
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 12:51 am
Location: England

Post by Derek »

Ok. thanks. Just never noticed it in the autocomplete list before and there's nothing in the help files or on the forum search.
Seymour Clufley
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1118
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:13 am
Location: London

Post by Seymour Clufley »

I see it also works with ENcoder.

Derek, how did you find this?!
pdwyer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2759
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Chiba, Japan

Post by pdwyer »

:o

Is this just in the beta still?
Paul Dwyer

“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
User avatar
djes
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Pas-de-Calais, France

Post by djes »

It's a fantastic news! JPEG2000 is a lot more efficient than jpeg, sometimes more than 10x! Just encode your pictures with xnview (for example), and voilà.

I'm happy! :D
Derek
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 12:51 am
Location: England

Post by Derek »

Seymour Clufley wrote:I see it also works with ENcoder.

Derek, how did you find this?!
It just turned up in the autocomplete so I thought I would ask. Sounds like a good addition. :)
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 14215
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

Damit, i tough it wouldn't be spoted ;). I forget to remove it for beta 3. It's not even beta, it is planned for 4.30.
Derek
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 12:51 am
Location: England

Post by Derek »

So is it reliable or should we all stop using it now. :wink:
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 14215
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

We didn't tested it much, so use it at your own risk.
Derek
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 12:51 am
Location: England

Post by Derek »

Ok. Thanks.
User avatar
djes
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Pas-de-Calais, France

Post by djes »

Thank you very much Fred! It will be perfect for 3d textures, backgrounds, etc! :D
User avatar
DoubleDutch
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by DoubleDutch »

I forget to remove it for beta 3. It's not even beta, it is planned for 4.30.
So it will stay for now, or will it be removed and then come back?
https://deluxepixel.com <- My Business website
https://reportcomplete.com <- School end of term reports system
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 14215
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

It will be removed as it is not fully tested.
User avatar
djes
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1804
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Pas-de-Calais, France

Post by djes »

:cry:
I think I'll keep this beta 8)
Post Reply