I don't want to be nerving, but I'm so happy, that it is under development! I've got so many expectations. Although PB4Lin is already great... I just feel anxious, like the Windows users did some month ago! (And I know lots of people preferred a 4.0 beta 1 to 3.94, just to check out all the new commands an features).
Status of PB4 for linux?
Any News?
I don't want to be nerving, but I'm so happy, that it is under development! I've got so many expectations. Although PB4Lin is already great... I just feel anxious, like the Windows users did some month ago! (And I know lots of people preferred a 4.0 beta 1 to 3.94, just to check out all the new commands an features).

I don't want to be nerving, but I'm so happy, that it is under development! I've got so many expectations. Although PB4Lin is already great... I just feel anxious, like the Windows users did some month ago! (And I know lots of people preferred a 4.0 beta 1 to 3.94, just to check out all the new commands an features).
cheers,
bembulak
bembulak
Fred gave a recent update here:
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... sc&start=3
beware, an endless loop is in there somewhere.
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... sc&start=3
beware, an endless loop is in there somewhere.
-
computercoder
- New User

- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 5:55 am
- Location: Oxford, NC [USA]
It's been a while now. So I'm wondering if anyone got the private release and if so, how's the GTK2?
www.posemotion.com
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef
Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
-
WishMaster
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 277
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:13 pm
- Location: Franconia
- Contact:
-
dracflamloc
- Addict

- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:52 pm
- Contact:
As I understand it, KBASIC dropped QT support meanwhile:Straker wrote:Yep - which is why I don't use KBASIC.Fred wrote:The problem with QT is everyone which uses PB on linux to makes apps will have to pay for QT if the app isn't opensource, which is not an option.
http://kbasic.com/qt.htmlKBasic was intented to be Qt based till July 2006. Unfortunately, the Qt licenses I have bought do not allow me to use it for KBasic as I wished, as Trolltech told me July 2006. So Qt support will not be available anymore.
-
spacefractal
- User

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:05 pm
what about a mplayer support (windowed & fullscreen), instead of Quicktime? I remember mplayer can play in canvas an so on, or do I took fool?
What about creating .so files, rather than .dll.
I have not very much expert on Linux, and have looked for a mediaplayer for Linux in some time, and that possisble to creating so files (if I remember correct does the same thing as dll).
What about creating .so files, rather than .dll.
I have not very much expert on Linux, and have looked for a mediaplayer for Linux in some time, and that possisble to creating so files (if I remember correct does the same thing as dll).
mplayer support sounds nice, but let's see what Fed and the PureBasic development team will bring us.spacefractal wrote:what about a mplayer support (windowed & fullscreen), instead of Quicktime? I remember mplayer can play in canvas an so on, or do I took fool?
What about creating .so files, rather than .dll.
I have not very much expert on Linux, and have looked for a mediaplayer for Linux in some time, and that possisble to creating so files (if I remember correct does the same thing as dll).





