md5 Checksum

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
marc.andre.luscher
New User
New User
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:20 pm

md5 Checksum

Post by marc.andre.luscher »

Where is the "md5 Checksum" of PureBasic 5.62 Setup File (x86 & x64)?
User_Russian
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1443
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:01 pm
Location: Russia

Re: md5 Checksum

Post by User_Russian »

Here.

Code: Select all

UseMD5Fingerprint()
Debug FileFingerprint("PureBasic 5.62 Setup.exe", #PB_Cipher_MD5)
User avatar
NicTheQuick
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1226
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 7:43 pm
Location: Germany, Saarbrücken
Contact:

Re: md5 Checksum

Post by NicTheQuick »

I don't think he want's to calculate the checksum but he wants to know the original checksum to compare it to the one he downloaded.
The english grammar is freeware, you can use it freely - But it's not Open Source, i.e. you can not change it or publish it in altered way.
marc.andre.luscher
New User
New User
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:20 pm

Re: md5 Checksum

Post by marc.andre.luscher »

Exactly! I want to verify the PureBasic 5.62 (x86 & x64) for Windows, Full Version, downloaded from the "Registered users area".
User avatar
NicTheQuick
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1226
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 7:43 pm
Location: Germany, Saarbrücken
Contact:

Re: md5 Checksum

Post by NicTheQuick »

All I can I do is downloading it by myself, md5-ing it and send you the checksum. But the better way would be that Fred puts the MD5 or better SHA256 checksums online.

But why in the first place you want to check the checksum? Are you not sure if your browser, DNS settings or similar things were manipulated?
The english grammar is freeware, you can use it freely - But it's not Open Source, i.e. you can not change it or publish it in altered way.
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3995
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: md5 Checksum

Post by skywalk »

This would be a security check that the PureBasic download site was not altered. Better to use sha256.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Dude
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:49 pm

Re: md5 Checksum

Post by Dude »

skywalk wrote:This would be a security check that the PureBasic download site was not altered.
That's what the entire point of HTTPS is for. No need to checksum anything.
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3995
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: md5 Checksum

Post by skywalk »

I was not questioning https. Merely, that I am downloading a trusted file from a provider.
I don't really know the Purebasic servers, so I must trust they are genuine. Without a remotely secured hash of the install package, it is possible, though difficult, for a bad actor to replace the installer on the download server. You really should verify the files you download or run them in virtual machines.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
#NULL
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1440
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:54 pm
Location: right here

Re: md5 Checksum

Post by #NULL »

If the website itself is compromised then a hash offered by it could be as well so its pointless. It would only help if your connection would has been compromised when downloading the installer and if it's not compromised when downloading the hash. Even if the hash would be hosted by a different server you have to equally trust that other server and your connection. I have the suspicion someone wants to compare an installer acquired by other means. Note that "Registered users area" is the caption used before you log in. But I don't want to falsly accuse anybody.
Post Reply