Lebostein wrote:...At the moment I have the impression that PureBasic will be discontinued shortly... no more bug fixes, no more updates, no more informations or posts from the developers...
Will PureBasic die?
And every year the marmot greets!
Lebostein wrote:...At the moment I have the impression that PureBasic will be discontinued shortly... no more bug fixes, no more updates, no more informations or posts from the developers...
Will PureBasic die?
And every year the marmot greets!
Code: Select all
While PureBasic currently stays at version 5.62 (latest feature set of v5.60 and following bug-fixes) and PB's sister product for mobile development SpiderBasic reached version 2.2 now, rumours say that a new PB version is on the way. I can't tell you, when PB5.70 will arrive (you know: "when it's done..."), but stay tuned... :-)
No! If there are no updates for a long time, this is a good sign that there will be an big update soon.Lebostein wrote:Will there be a PureBasic 6? At the moment I have the impression that PureBasic will be discontinued shortly... no more bug fixes, no more updates, no more informations or posts from the developers...
Will PureBasic die?
I had to check the date of this post... and yep, it's a new post... so here we go again.Lebostein wrote:Will there be a PureBasic 6? At the moment I have the impression that PureBasic will be discontinued shortly... no more bug fixes, no more updates, no more informations or posts from the developers...
Will PureBasic die?
+1USCode wrote:SSL/TLS support for PB's Network library.
+1Fig wrote:...And number specific HashTables (Map with numbers as key)
+1skywalk wrote:2. Enable jump to definition of item under cursor.
Code: Select all
Structure Vector2D
x.d
y.d
EndStructure
Procedure.Vector2D addVector(*a.Vector2D, *b.Vector2D)
Protected c.Vector2D
c\x = a\x + b\x
c\y = a\y + b\y
ProcedureReturn c
EndProcedure
Define.Vector2d a, b, c
a\x = 1
b\x = 2
c = addVector(a, b)
Debug c\x ;= 3
Why not do this?:NicTheQuick wrote: Aaaand:
Procedures with structures as return type, so you can make this:Code: Select all
Structure Vector2D x.d y.d EndStructure Procedure.Vector2D addVector(*a.Vector2D, *b.Vector2D) Protected c.Vector2D c\x = a\x + b\x c\y = a\y + b\y ProcedureReturn c EndProcedure Define.Vector2d a, b, c a\x = 1 b\x = 2 c = addVector(a, b) Debug c\x ;= 3
Code: Select all
Structure Vector2D
x.d
y.d
EndStructure
Procedure.i newVector(x,y)
*a.Vector2D = AllocateStructure(Vector2D)
*a\x = x
*a\y = y
ProcedureReturn *a
EndProcedure
Procedure.i addVector(*a.Vector2D,*b.Vector2D)
*c.Vector2D = newVector(0,0)
*c\x = *a\x + *b\x
*c\y = *a\y + *b\y
ProcedureReturn *c
EndProcedure
*a.Vector2D = newVector(1,0)
*b.Vector2D = newVector(2,0)
*c.Vector2D = addVector(*a,*b)
Debug *c\x ;= 3
FreeStructure(*a)
FreeStructure(*b)
FreeStructure(*c)
Oh! That's a spoiler!Fred wrote:5.70 beta should be out shortly
This might be a candidate for 2018:Lord wrote:I hoped to get new entries in The PureBasic Doomsday Quotes.
Lebostein wrote:Will there be a PureBasic 6? At the moment I have the impression that PureBasic will be discontinued shortly... no more bug fixes, no more updates, no more informations or posts from the developers...
Will PureBasic die?
agree 50%; but: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Web_AppI myself think the development time for SpiderBasic would have been better invested in PureBasic.
agree 100% - but discussing is always a good ideaBut that's just my personal subjective opinion.
There's no point in discussing the same thing, and it doesn't change anything.
It's just the way it is.
Because I do not want to use FreeStructure(). And I want also to be able to do this:the.weavster wrote:Why not do this?:Code: Select all
<snip>
Code: Select all
debug addVector(a, b)\x
Code: Select all
Debug Vector2d(1, 2).add(Vector2Dd(2,2))\length() ; =5
I'm really glad SB exists and that PB now has some excellent commands for creating CGIs.walbus wrote:I myself think the development time for SpiderBasic would have been better invested in PureBasic.