Mac OSX PB users
-
- User
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:47 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Mac OSX PB users
How many folks are actually using PB on OSX?
Fred, Freak, Kale and me makes four.
Anybody else who has done more than download and a quick test?
Fred, Freak, Kale and me makes four.
Anybody else who has done more than download and a quick test?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:12 pm
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 3:13 am
- Location: 90-61-92 // EU or ASIA
- Contact:
Re: Mac OSX PB users
This topic would in offtopic forum?pantsonhead wrote:How many folks are actually using PB on OSX?
Fred, Freak, Kale and me makes four.
Anybody else who has done more than download and a quick test?
-
- Addict
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:52 pm
- Contact:
-
- User
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:47 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Is that all?
So no advances on four current OSX users?
No wonder this forum is a bit quiet
No wonder this forum is a bit quiet
Might take a look on it soon, yes, emulating OSX on Windows. I just don't have the latest build, guess It's time to get it, lucky enough a friend has a G5, and he has no problem on hosting the cds on his ftp - Notice I'm anti MAC though.
.
Will get some spare time soon to finish the spanish language file for the new PB editor as well
.
Will get some spare time soon to finish the spanish language file for the new PB editor as well
-
- User
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:47 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
I am using it, but I'm not doing anything serious with it yet. Most of the apps I write are for work (we are a Borg shop) so working on the Mac is limited to small stuff for home use.
I think the support will grow quickly as soon as the final (non-beta) version is complete and a demo can be downloaded.
I think the support will grow quickly as soon as the final (non-beta) version is complete and a demo can be downloaded.
-Beach
-
- User
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:16 pm
- Location: Germany
I'm using it on my PowerMac-G5, but I don't have much time. Also I was going to port a very small game of mine to Mac - but after I realised that WindowOutput() doesn't work I gave up as I didn't want to use fullscreen.
At the moment I don't really need a selfmade-app, so I don't code recently.
At the moment I don't really need a selfmade-app, so I don't code recently.
iMac CoreDuo, MacBook C2D, OSX 10.5.5
PureBasic owner since V1.0 for Amiga
PureBasic owner since V1.0 for Amiga
-
- New User
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 3:19 pm
- Location: Germany
hope the team will continue to support *All* platforms...
Hi !
I've been fooling around a some time with Real Basic. It's a nice product - but they are changing their marketing concept to often. (RB is getting to expensive )
Meanwhile I also bought a license of Purebasic: I discovered the product in some Radio-Shack Store (It's called "Saturn Hansa").
The only reason I was still interested in RB was: There was no version of PureBasic for Mac OS X.
But now - finally - there's a version of Purebasic for all OS'es
@The developers: Please go on with the development of PB for WIN,Mac & Linux. Because there *are* Users who are interested in a good crossplatform Basic Dialect. I think you should aim the target to the market of frustrated RB-Users (like me: using the buggy & expensive RB...) For e.g.: Ever tried to call an OS-Routine from RB ? I don't know a way in the *new*, Version 5 RB. It's even not so easy in PB - but it's possible ! For e.g.: Did someone ever try to export sourcecode in RB and to reimport it then to RB. I tried - it's not possible.)
Resume: PB is the better product - for me - and RB is getting too expensive ! So go ahead releasing the OS X and Linux Versions - please
Wish: could you implement a better oracle support in PB ? (without ODBC ?)
I've been fooling around a some time with Real Basic. It's a nice product - but they are changing their marketing concept to often. (RB is getting to expensive )
Meanwhile I also bought a license of Purebasic: I discovered the product in some Radio-Shack Store (It's called "Saturn Hansa").
The only reason I was still interested in RB was: There was no version of PureBasic for Mac OS X.
But now - finally - there's a version of Purebasic for all OS'es
@The developers: Please go on with the development of PB for WIN,Mac & Linux. Because there *are* Users who are interested in a good crossplatform Basic Dialect. I think you should aim the target to the market of frustrated RB-Users (like me: using the buggy & expensive RB...) For e.g.: Ever tried to call an OS-Routine from RB ? I don't know a way in the *new*, Version 5 RB. It's even not so easy in PB - but it's possible ! For e.g.: Did someone ever try to export sourcecode in RB and to reimport it then to RB. I tried - it's not possible.)
Resume: PB is the better product - for me - and RB is getting too expensive ! So go ahead releasing the OS X and Linux Versions - please
Wish: could you implement a better oracle support in PB ? (without ODBC ?)
Michael H.G. Schmidt
-
- User
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 7:21 pm
- Location: The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.
- Contact:
Testing on OS X 10.4.3
Hi,
Just found PureBasic for Mac OSX. I should absolute test it out. The Mac users need an new Basic compiler! I have worked with REALbasic in over three years ... every day... And have written the SEEdit XHTML Editor for Macintosh.
I think there are a lot of Mac users that not know that PureBasic now also works on Mac OS X.
Regards,
SEO
Just found PureBasic for Mac OSX. I should absolute test it out. The Mac users need an new Basic compiler! I have worked with REALbasic in over three years ... every day... And have written the SEEdit XHTML Editor for Macintosh.
I think there are a lot of Mac users that not know that PureBasic now also works on Mac OS X.
Regards,
SEO