PureBasic 4.20 Beta - All OS

Developed or developing a new product in PureBasic? Tell the world about it.
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 16619
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

Thoerically, nothing link with VC8 runtime anymore (check that with "dependency walker"). Kale, can you run it on the pbcompiler executable to see if it miss some DLL ?
quasiperfect
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:16 pm
Location: Romania
Contact:

Post by quasiperfect »

thanks a lot for the entire team work
the money spent on pb was the smartest purchase ever :)
keep up the good work
Registered user of PureBasic
User avatar
graves
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: To the deal with a pepper

Re: PureBasic 4.20 Beta 5 - Windows

Post by graves »

Tipperton wrote:Thank you Fred! I think I'll have to send you another "donation" when 4.20 is released because this seems more like a major version release than a point release.
YES! Me too. "Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is".

Many tanks to all developpers.
User avatar
Ajm
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 234
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 9:27 pm
Location: Kent, UK

Post by Ajm »

You guys work so hard on this fantastic language. I've made a small donation to pay for the coffee you must use whilst burning the midnight oils.

Many thanks to all involved.
Regards

Andy

Image
Registered PB & PureVision User
Tipperton
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:55 pm

Re: PureBasic 4.20 Beta 5 - Windows

Post by Tipperton »

Fred wrote:we decided it was time to migrate to VisualC++ 2005. This choice was made for serveral reasons:

4) It has a X64 version as well, so we have a direct port to 64 bits Windows without too much hassle (at least for the libraries)
Are you sure of that?

Accrding to the product comparisons I saw on Microsoft's web site the express editions can only produce x64 programs if you are using .NET

In order to compile native x64 programs you have to get at least the standard edition of Visual Studio which is $300 USD or $200 USD if you qualify for upgrade pricing (have a prior version of Visual Studio including the free express editions).
User avatar
Psychophanta
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4975
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
Location: Lípetsk, Russian Federation
Contact:

Post by Psychophanta »

Great work,
many thanks :)
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com

While world=business:world+mafia:Wend
Will never leave this forum until the absolute bugfree PB :mrgreen:
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 16619
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: PureBasic 4.20 Beta 5 - Windows

Post by Fred »

Tipperton wrote:
Fred wrote:we decided it was time to migrate to VisualC++ 2005. This choice was made for serveral reasons:

4) It has a X64 version as well, so we have a direct port to 64 bits Windows without too much hassle (at least for the libraries)
Are you sure of that?

Accrding to the product comparisons I saw on Microsoft's web site the express editions can only produce x64 programs if you are using .NET

In order to compile native x64 programs you have to get at least the standard edition of Visual Studio which is $300 USD or $200 USD if you qualify for upgrade pricing (have a prior version of Visual Studio including the free express editions).
The 64 bits commandline compiler is available in the PSDK, we don't use it from the IDE.
Trond
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 7446
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:45 pm
Location: Norway

Re: PureBasic 4.20 Beta 5 - Windows

Post by Trond »

Fred wrote:At least, all the quad reported bugs are now fixed.
Sorry to spoil the party but there is problem with this and the debugger enabled:

Code: Select all

Q.q/ElapsedMilliseconds()
milan1612
Addict
Addict
Posts: 894
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:15 am
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
Contact:

Post by milan1612 »

Thank you so much, your (hard) work is appreciated!
Thanks again...
Windows 7 & PureBasic 4.4
Baldrick
Addict
Addict
Posts: 860
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Australia

Post by Baldrick »

milan1612 wrote:Thank you so much, your (hard) work is appreciated!
Thanks again...
Agree totally.
User avatar
DoubleDutch
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3219
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by DoubleDutch »

Thanks for all the hard work, very much appreciated. Maybe though it would be a good idea to have the last few betas still available to download, just in case there is a new bug introduced to a new beta and you forgot to backup the old folder? (like the situation I have just found myself in. :oops: ).
Last edited by DoubleDutch on Sat May 10, 2008 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
https://deluxepixel.com <- My Business website
https://reportcomplete.com <- School end of term reports system
byo
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 635
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:43 am
Location: Brazil

Post by byo »

A post of that size really shows you care a lot about what you do. Thank you, Fred and fr3ak. My kind respects to you and keep on rocking! :D
Proud registered Purebasic user.
Because programming should be fun.
Tipperton
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:55 pm

Re: PureBasic 4.20 Beta 5 - Windows

Post by Tipperton »

Fred wrote:The 64 bits commandline compiler is available in the PSDK, we don't use it from the IDE.
Ah!

Rock on then! :mrgreen:
Mistrel
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:04 pm

Post by Mistrel »

Thank you for such an amazing language and for all your hard work, the entire PB team. I really hope for the best for this language.
..so we decided to migrate all the assembly libraries (linked list, misc etc.) on NASM. Indeed the compiler has been modified to output NASM compatible code instead of FASM.
I have not had a chance to try it yet but does this mean that TailBite is broken for 4.20 B5? :cry:
johnfinch
User
User
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 1:45 am
Location: florida
Contact:

Post by johnfinch »

Thrilled to hear the great news about the x86 Mac version. Have my dreams finally come true?
Leopard-parallels-XP-Vista
Post Reply