Sorry but with all respect .... why don't you read the first (release)-post or the docs when using this a tool?
Even as I did point that out in the first page.
Part of inc.'s first post wrote:- A final beautyfied output of the converted code. Easy to read i.e. in forums, like if you dont want to force the user to use the Preprocessor to make your code work!
(The converted code can be found in the users temp directory of the Windows installation)
Means you can find a beautyfied easy-to-read conversion to PB nativ code in the same directory where PB in general does safe the temporary files before sending them to the compiler. So this will be in newer PB versions your users temp file.
How do you handle things internally?, stack-based system?.
Do look into the temporary generated code like explained above and you'll see how the approach is done.
Also as I already answered you in the projects page forum, in here above and as its mentioned in the docs: objects are simply heap allocated, so no stack based system i used.
superadnim wrote:although I was focusing on a more C-like syntax (; delimiter as line endings, c-like array declaration and variable assignment
My purpose wasn't to invent a new preprocessor language, ... it is an integration of an OOP style paradigm into the present PureBasic Language and its syntax logic.
If I want to code using ";" as line endings and prefering c-like arrays then I actually simply do use "C".
I don't mind the pointer declaration, I was just bitchin' out loud
You weren't just bitching out loud, you have been triple posting your Q's over three areas.
Thats annoying btw.