Exe that works always

[boyoss]

I want to set my computer so an exe will always run and it will be never stopped. The exe has a critical flag, so when it's launched, it can't be stopped. I registered it in the run of the registry so it start automatically.

The question is is it still possible to someone to launch the computer without this exe running?

1.he can enter to safe mode and delete the entry of the registry, so how can i set the exe to automaticlly launch also in safe mode?
2. He can enter to the computer with a linux installation, and delete the entry from the registry, and also delete the exe itself

The question is how to protect that a maximum. I know that there wil be always someone who will find a trick i didn't think about it, but how can i protect this a maximum.

Thanks

[Bisonte]

You really ask the second time for help to write a program that have the same behaviour like a virus ???

[infratec]

Forget it.

If a user is good enough, there is always a way:

Boot with a Linux live CD and edit the registry.

[boyoss]

First of all i don't have an anti-virus on my machine.
Secondly it's not for a virus, it's to protect my computer.
And thirdly, i took the idea from the anti-virus themselves, that you can't stop them even in safe mode.

So let's forget the problem of linux, but it must be a solution to protect the safe mode,isn't it?

[boyoss]

Ok i found something, hope it works
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1070 ... -safe-mode

[nco2k]

it's to protect my computer

if you have to ask such questions, then you are nowhere near skilled enough to create something that can "protect" you. but honestly, who are you trying to fool here?

even anti-virus apps have certain limitations, but you are asking questions on how to get rid of those limitations. none of your questions point to defense, but to hijacking a system instead. every question you asked so far was basically a "how to create malware 101" question. im surprised that other forum members didnt see right through it and actually tried to help you. personally, if i was a mod here, i would have banned you weeks ago. purebasic executables have already enough trouble dealing with anti-virus software, because some idiots abuse this language for their shitty malware.

when it comes to system access, im pretty open minded and i know most of it can be used for the good and the bad. but when you try to lock out a user from his own system, there is no talking out of it. period.

c ya,
nco2k

[Michael Vogel]

Boyoss, all have been said, but please rethink your approach to make all your computers around you more safe (again)
I'm not sure if you are (or ever will be) a genius programmer, but what about going to get a windows server administrator training?

[Keya]

A lot of the protection you're enquiring about can only be done properly with drivers/kernel mode; CPU privilege levels exist for a reason and modern OS make heavy use of them, especially these days with signed drivers. But this is serious stuff! and unless you've been writing drivers and 'living security' for many years (neither which seem evident with all due respect) you're probably not going to get very far. And if you can't efficiently write kernel drivers then that's the end of the story, sorry but you won't be able to do what you want to do, and any usermode butchery is not only useless and trivial to defeat but is negatively system-debilitating - you pay a big price for that useless plastic padlock. There's a lot of things i wish I could program too, but we've all got to work within our own limits, and focus on getting the walking part better if we eventually want to run! But I commend you for being security conscious, as it seems even in 2017 many coders still aren't!

[Josh]

it's to protect my computer

if you have to ask such questions, then you are nowhere near skilled enough to create something that can "protect" you. but honestly, who are you trying to fool here?

even anti-virus apps have certain limitations, but you are asking questions on how to get rid of those limitations. none of your questions point to defense, but to hijacking a system instead. every question you asked so far was basically a "how to create malware 101" question. im surprised that other forum members didnt see right through it and actually tried to help you. personally, if i was a mod here, i would have banned you weeks ago. purebasic executables have already enough trouble dealing with anti-virus software, because some idiots abuse this language for their shitty malware.

when it comes to system access, im pretty open minded and i know most of it can be used for the good and the bad. but when you try to lock out a user from his own system, there is no talking out of it. period.

c ya,
nco2k

+1

[TI-994A]

...it seems even in 2017 many coders still aren't!

It's hardly been thirty days. Let's give 2017 a chance.

[Fred]

Hello boyoss,

If you continue to ask for such question, you will not be welcome anymore here. I already explained than a lot of antivirus flag regular exe (even the IDE) because some guys wrote troyans or virus using PB. We won't tolerate this.