PureBasic Forums - English

I third this

I say PB+OGL is a fine combination.

Fred can just focus on building a strong core language, and I'll focus on doing the 3D part.

Hmm, couldn't find myself in another thread to check my post count, so I'll post here.

Hahah, +1 posts for me.



[EDIT]

Booyah! 66

Being from the Dark Basic community, I realised as soon as I saw the PB .dll tutorial on the Dark Basic website that I should warn the Administor about protecting PB.

So I shall do so now. (Heh, it was only last month I was the one asking about legal questions. Search "legal" in the newcomer ...

Well, too late anyway. I already started C++ for the .dll.

Continue on...

Awesome Balrogsoft!

This keeps getting better and better.

Yeah, free-updates are something that must always be allowed. When peolpe buy software, they expect it to be workable as soon as they get it.

As far as people distributing applications with your program you can do something very simple. Have a watermark that shows up in their programs before they ...

Well, as far as the situation goes just try to Keep it Simple (Stupid ).

Free for freeware developers and then a set dollar amount for those who want to launch their program commercially.



[EDIT] Free updates would also look great.

Hehe, I may be in a mental institution at 20 worrying about all the legal junk these days.

Thanks everyone for your help. Fred has contacted me, and everyone of these code snippets would not be legal to distribute. I respect that, so as mentioned before I'll have to use the winapi.

Hehe, already getting my hands dirty and mangled into the WinAPI.



<----- First time messing with WinAPI.

Argh, I was hoping it wouldn't come to that.
*Smacks self*

I guess I might as well start now. :) If Fred gets my e-mail I'm sure he'll be able to clarify this.

No need to reply any more.

***Thread Locked Problem Solved***

;)

[Edit] PolyVector by all means, I don't want to short change Fred at ...

Hmm, I was hoping that wouldn't be the case. Return Gadget isn't going to be too helpful if I don't have any gadgets. :D

How about this one?

(A button/image gadget function. Read documentation if you'd like to use it.)
;This command will create a button. Gadget specifies the gadget number.X and ...

Alright, 1 last post. (Sorry for all the rapid posting. I'm just needing to finish this DLL soon for a few projects)

To boil everything down nice and simple, tell me if these commands are legal to distribute in a DLL.

Returns properties of the current gadget selected.
ProcedureDLL ...

Thanks for your advice everyone.

blueznl: Hmm, I'll take a look into that. Might make things a little more difficult than they already are, but I'll definitly look into it.

BalrogSoft: Yeah, the source I posted for what I'm trying to do makes things complicated. In short, it's 2 commands in 1 ...

E-mail has been sent. Hopefully we'll get a final anwser on this. :)

----------------------
Unfortuantly from my FileRequester snippet above, it's not what I consider substansially different so I may be out of luck. Never know though, it's binding two commands into one so that might make the ...