Hi,
Thanks to everyone who helped with my question regarding the speed of PureBasic. I understand now that it is as fast as anything else, particularly is ASM is used in calculation-intensive loops.
The next question is, in terms of raw speed (i.e., floating point calculations), would the compiled ...
Search found 8 matches
- Thu Jan 29, 2004 2:56 pm
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Windows vs Linux PureBasic speed
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1080
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:13 pm
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Speed of PureBasic
- Replies: 54
- Views: 18224
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 11:01 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Speed of PureBasic
- Replies: 54
- Views: 18224
- Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:57 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Speed of PureBasic
- Replies: 54
- Views: 18224
- Mon Jan 26, 2004 3:09 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Speed of PureBasic
- Replies: 54
- Views: 18224
- Sat Jan 24, 2004 6:19 pm
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Speed of PureBasic
- Replies: 54
- Views: 18224
- Fri Jan 23, 2004 11:14 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Speed of PureBasic
- Replies: 54
- Views: 18224
- Fri Jan 23, 2004 5:23 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Speed of PureBasic
- Replies: 54
- Views: 18224
Speed of PureBasic
Hi,
I was trying to find out how fast PureBasic is compared to other BASIC compilers (e.g., VB, PowerBASIC). Using the trial version I tried to run the following simple programme for a 100 million iteration of a float calculation:
Global xx.l, yy.f, zz.f
yy.f = 1.000001
zz.f = 1
For xx.l = 1 ...
I was trying to find out how fast PureBasic is compared to other BASIC compilers (e.g., VB, PowerBASIC). Using the trial version I tried to run the following simple programme for a 100 million iteration of a float calculation:
Global xx.l, yy.f, zz.f
yy.f = 1.000001
zz.f = 1
For xx.l = 1 ...