PureBasic Forums - English

Nice example. But I don't want to use ActiveX's but gadgets beacause of cross-platform (linux) capabilities. So I need user defined gadgets and not ActiiveX's

@Karbon
- of cause I say VB6; it is a nice system with great feature; but I think PB is better for my purposes, otherwise I would'n post my threads here :wink:

@LarsG and venom
- having your editor test your variables is much less save than having the compiler do the job. And it could be switched ...

@Karbon
Thanks. I will look for it.

@freedimension
- Is there a public ToDo-List for next version of PB? I didn't find one yet.
- Of cause I can use pointers, but parameters woul be easier and - hey we use a BASIC language
- regarding VB6: large runtime, no linux support otherwise I would use it ...

It would be nice to have an option to force variable declaration like OPTION EXPLICIT in VB6.

Hello PureBasic-Team,

I would like to suggest some improvements on PureBasic:

Compiler:
- compiler macros like C/C++
- in-build support of Try-Catch-Finally error handling
- one-statement, multi-line support (like _ for line breaking in vb6)

PureBasic:
- easier support of classes with public ...