PureBasic Forums - English

Thanks for this fillip!

How to do this in a way, which will be working on all supported operating systems?

Thank you.

Because that area is depending from different entities it would be helpful to know about its details. So how to accomplish that? Thank you in advance.

Still the beta is not working. Starting an example will make PureBasic non reacting.
My OS X has version 10.8.2 - where does the beta work?

Well, indeed the command line tools had been missing ...

Well, I am sure to have Xcode already installed.

Nevertheless I just have made a money transaction for
to pay for an upgrade, also to get the current beta.

Thank you and regards to all active PB users !

After some time of not using PureBasic today I have tried to get a 4.61 version of
PureBasic work on my MacBook Pro using Mac OS X 10.8.2. But all I get is:

PureBasic - Assembler error
sh: nasm: command not found

So what has to be done to get a current test version of PureBasic run here?

Best ...

It normally would be very interesting for me to upgrade from my DTP version. But during the last time I am working using Mac OS X. I presume, there would be a lot of other Mac users, too, who probably could be convinced to buy the actual version of PureBasic, simply by providing the visual designer ...

@jamirokwai: of course virtualization does it. Personally I am using VMware Fusion 3.0.0 which has an acceptable speed.

Some ideas to use crossover are based on its low storage consumption and the nearly generic execution speed, IF a software could be COMPATIBLY installed. Additionally it is a good ...

It seems to me that I have had to do something additional during its installation.

I have made a simple installation into a Win XP bottle, because the Mac version still seems to have some weaknesses (e.g. no editor font selection is possible yet). Now under CrossOver there the toolbar has not been ...

Psychophanta wrote:What about to write to avira about the issue?

Done. Hope some others would follow up.

@luis: Hmm, I am very surprised, that you seem to intend making
me a part of your life. Thus it maybe a welcomed though unintended
feature of my alias "Octopus" not to be liked by yourself, as I am
not prepared to have a copy of mine spooking around your place.

But more seriously now: the ...

Well, you know, I know now. But a new user of PureBasic does
not know about that. So his first reaction will be to blame
PureBasic for that unwanted message, though he would be
addressing the wrong target.

Modifying that single part of the package would increase
PureBasic's acceptance anyway. So ...

Well then. Nevertheless, is it possible to modify that
example for to avoid such a kind of a warning message?