Thanks for these examples!
To my current understanding, Cairo may also use OpenGL "under the hood" - am I right?
I've looked at Cairo and am quite impressed! I think, I'll go for that library - it's both powerful and easy to use
Search found 47 matches
- Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:16 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: general rotation/scaling support for 2D drawings?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3086
- Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:28 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: general rotation/scaling support for 2D drawings?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3086
Re: general rotation/scaling support for 2D drawings?
That's an interesting idea (Cairo)
Thanks for the hint!
Thanks for the hint!
- Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:20 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: general rotation/scaling support for 2D drawings?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3086
general rotation/scaling support for 2D drawings?
Hello!
This might be a dumb question (and should already have been answered somewhere else in this forum - but I could not find it):
To my understanding, the "2D Drawing" functions do not generically support translation/scaling/rotation of graphics contexts - am I right? There are some special ...
This might be a dumb question (and should already have been answered somewhere else in this forum - but I could not find it):
To my understanding, the "2D Drawing" functions do not generically support translation/scaling/rotation of graphics contexts - am I right? There are some special ...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:42 pm
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: [PB4.40_x86] really annoying editor behaviour
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2184
Re: [PB4.40_x86] really annoying editor behaviour
Hello again!
I might have found a workaround (which let's me use PB again, at least):
- configure two tools for the tools panel, at least (I chose "Procedure Browser" and "ASCII Table")
- after having used the "Procedure Browser" (e.g. by clicking on a procedure's name) immediately switch to the ...
I might have found a workaround (which let's me use PB again, at least):
- configure two tools for the tools panel, at least (I chose "Procedure Browser" and "ASCII Table")
- after having used the "Procedure Browser" (e.g. by clicking on a procedure's name) immediately switch to the ...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:53 pm
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: [PB4.40_x86] really annoying editor behaviour
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2184
Re: [PB4.40_x86] really annoying editor behaviour
Hello!
I just verified that I am using the latested version of PB (i.e. 4.40 beta 3).
Before installing it, I manually removed the old PureBasic folder to wipe out any previous installation.
The problem still appears...
I just verified that I am using the latested version of PB (i.e. 4.40 beta 3).
Before installing it, I manually removed the old PureBasic folder to wipe out any previous installation.
The problem still appears...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:44 pm
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: [PB4.40_x86] really annoying editor behaviour
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2184
[PB4.40_x86] really annoying editor behaviour
Hello!
From time to time I run into a really annyoing editor behaviour: whenever I press Return or try to position the mouse within the editor, it jumps to a fixed location within the code, e.g. the procedure I selected earlier in the "Procedures" list.
This behaviour is *really* annyoing! Does ...
From time to time I run into a really annyoing editor behaviour: whenever I press Return or try to position the mouse within the editor, it jumps to a fixed location within the code, e.g. the procedure I selected earlier in the "Procedures" list.
This behaviour is *really* annyoing! Does ...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:08 pm
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: Is there a possibility to debug a shared object?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1294
Re: Is there a possibility to debug a shared object?
By the way,
I solved my original problem:
if you want to use PB to build a "bundle" which is then used in other programs, please use ProcedureCDLL (mind the *C*!) rather than ProcedureDLL!
I now know again why I hate C and C++...
I solved my original problem:
if you want to use PB to build a "bundle" which is then used in other programs, please use ProcedureCDLL (mind the *C*!) rather than ProcedureDLL!
I now know again why I hate C and C++...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:33 pm
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: Snow Leopard MUST READ!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6214
Re: Snow Leopard MUST READ!
Hmmm,
is this a 32-bit vs. 64-bit issue? I did not yet have a chance to get my hands on a Mac with Snow-Leopard, but my MacBook Pro with Leopard claims to be a 32-bit machine ("uname -a" yields something with "i386" only)
This sounds strange as crash reports already mention 64-bit addresses - but ...
is this a 32-bit vs. 64-bit issue? I did not yet have a chance to get my hands on a Mac with Snow-Leopard, but my MacBook Pro with Leopard claims to be a 32-bit machine ("uname -a" yields something with "i386" only)
This sounds strange as crash reports already mention 64-bit addresses - but ...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:56 am
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: Is there a possibility to debug a shared object?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1294
Is there a possibility to debug a shared object?
Hello!
I've just created a small .so file which I would like to use in another environment. Currently, that environment crashes after loading my library - presumably because it's always difficult to get all the pointer stuff right.
Is there a possibility to "debug" a .so library which was built ...
I've just created a small .so file which I would like to use in another environment. Currently, that environment crashes after loading my library - presumably because it's always difficult to get all the pointer stuff right.
Is there a possibility to "debug" a .so library which was built ...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:53 am
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: How does one build bundles for loadable modules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1598
Re: How does one build bundles for loadable modules
Hmmm,
the library now seems to be loaded! Believe it or not, it seems that it is still not advisable to have spaces in a folder path! Even on a Macintosh (well, it's a UNIX underneath)
I found the problem because PB wasn't able to load the original .so after moving that into a folder with a space ...
the library now seems to be loaded! Believe it or not, it seems that it is still not advisable to have spaces in a folder path! Even on a Macintosh (well, it's a UNIX underneath)
I found the problem because PB wasn't able to load the original .so after moving that into a folder with a space ...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:15 am
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: How does one build bundles for loadable modules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1598
Re: How does one build bundles for loadable modules
Just as a remark:
- PB is able to load the original .so file
- PB is also able to load the .so file after it has been "bundled" with the beforementioned Gnu libtool script (when one properly points into the bundle's subdirectory)
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:50 am
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: How does one build bundles for loadable modules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1598
How does one build bundles for loadable modules
Hello!
It's great to see that PB is now able to create shared object (.so) files under MacOS X - but how does one create complete "bundles" (for what is called "loadable modules") under MacOS X?
I've already tried a script that seems to come with the Gnu libtool: the result looked like a .bundle ...
It's great to see that PB is now able to create shared object (.so) files under MacOS X - but how does one create complete "bundles" (for what is called "loadable modules") under MacOS X?
I've already tried a script that seems to come with the Gnu libtool: the result looked like a .bundle ...
- Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:35 pm
- Forum: Announcement
- Topic: PureBasic 4.30 final released!
- Replies: 67
- Views: 37834
...but neither .dylibs nor .so's (I am not so sure about .so's, but generation of .dylibs is broken right now) Fred once wrote: "...dylib on OS X doesn't work for now. It's planned for 4.40." (see http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtopic.php?t=32890&highlight=)
And one of the outstanding features ...
And one of the outstanding features ...
- Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:32 am
- Forum: Announcement
- Topic: PureBasic 4.30 final released!
- Replies: 67
- Views: 37834
- Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:09 pm
- Forum: Mac OSX
- Topic: [4.30 x86] any experiences with PB apps under MacOS X x86?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2699