PureBasic Forums - English

I was refering to wiping off your posts

My copy has been discarded in shame

Yes LOCK before swamping please

I cancell my follow up on this thread and will not see it any more anyway


gebe

Why ?

Changed your mind ??.....

I did'nt


gebe

I was STUPID enough to buy this one !!! :oops: :oops: :oops:
There are plenty "wrappers" for Power Basic in fact this one is the most expensive one (like its base), ergo the intense need for pimping.,,,,

I use Pure Basic (cheap wrapping paper)==>> BEST value for money 8)
and RosAsm (assembly ...

My mistake

Trond,

The tests


;enable inline asm
;put a break point everywhere
;and show the ASM debug window
v1.l=256+255;0x1ff
v2.l=256*2+255;0x2ff
v3.l=256*3+255
Debug Hex(v1)+ " " +Hex(v2) + " "+Hex(v3)

*v1=@v1
*v2=@v2;hopefully they'll be following each other
*v3=@v3
Debug "Address v1 (*v1) : " +Hex ...

Trond,
Yes ,except that you cannot do: mov eax,edi+4
The compiler objects to that.
Enjoy the rest of your Week-end.

gebe You can't do lea eax, edi+4 either. But you can do lea eax, [edi+4] and mov eax, [edi+4].

The compiler accepts it but

The result will be different !
lea eax,[edi+4] will ...

Trond,
Yes ,except that you cannot do: mov eax,edi+4
The compiler objects to that.
Enjoy the rest of your Week-end.

gebe

This post might be stupid after the real specialist has spoken.
Please treat it more as a question than anything else...

For what it is worth: (I am far ,far from beeing a specialist).
I tried the following to be able to follow up the stack easily.
I cannot stop in the debugger with the < !code ...

- lea versus mov :

lea edx,[edi] ;load the contents of the edi into the edx (1)
mov edx,[edi] ;load the value at edi into the edx (2)
mov edx,edi ;move the contents of the edi into the edx (3)

- (1) and (3) are equivalent.

- So what are the differences?

- (3) is faster than (1) and is ...

My contribution,after (finally) :oops: "understanding"the 2 different ways of using
machine code.C type conversion ,using a buffer.


gebe :)
]
;was not tested for speed
;only an exercise
Procedure StrL(l.l,*p)
!MOV eax,dword[p.v_l]
! PUSH edi;+4 for the push
! MOV edi,dword[p.p_p+4];the pointer ...

Just joined the French forum...Just for the ASM forum

Searched and I already got after 15 minutes what I've been looking for here (During one week)

Just a suggsestion to add weight to some post I 've lost sight of.

Derrick I am still working on my speeds .

I have added RosASM to my "strings ...

Or, you can send them a mail saying, if you reply to this email or send me any other email correspondence of any kind, you agree to give me a free license to PowerBasic and a free lifetime upgrade. hehehehe

Too dangerous to speek about any "Free"stuff ...

That could give somebody there a heart ...

Trond wrote:
Does PowerBasic have a demo version?

NO ! You pay ...you get your demo + pay for the delivery by E-Mail
They cannot loose .

Speek about being banned.?

I banned myself.
I still get the "nice" Emails telling me how great they are.

gebe

Many thanks net maestro.
I obviousely loooked at the wrong places.
gebe
the big eyes for the GLASSES !!!

Hi all,

I am not sure ,but I seem to remember that I saw somewhere that it is possible to enforce declaration of variables.
I can be wrong or I cannot find it anymore .
If it exists please let me know how.
If it does not ,I wish to put it on the list of requests.
I just spent a few hours looking ...