PureBasic Forums - English

Thanks

thefool wrote:"You cannot have a moral without being religious"
I would have enjoyed a "WTF?" option

Agreed!

pdwyer wrote:will that discussion really be missed though?

Hardly. But hardly the point either. Go through the threads here and decide which ones would really be missed if they were deleted/locked. Then see how many of those were locked.

The thread was locked on an assumption.

Would you like your threads to locked because someone assumes something?

Okay, I understand the General Discussion thing.


As to invitation to flamewar, this forum doesn't need an invitation. Check out just about any thread.

I think it was rightfully locked. It was such a blatant attempt at trying to get certain responses, that it's... well... even... even within Kale's rights :-)

Hope you're joking - otherwise you are defining a precedent that allows just about any thread to be locked.

The abruptness of the lock ...

Um ... Why?

It was hardly trolling in OT (as our self-righteous Dr suggested) and no more likely to start a flame-war than any other thread in OT (the most innocuous threads end up with five-word vocabulary individuals insulting each other).

So could someone humour me and explain why?

Thanks!

Rook Zimbabwe wrote:{That was a BAD pun!!!}

Yes

Ex Spurt = Old Drip!


* runs away and hides *

Maybe you can klurge this klurge to get something?

http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... ent#122731


Hope it is useful.

thefool wrote:

Dare wrote:Happy birthday!

You must be getting towards "OF" (old fart) status!

No that title follows you

I'm willing to share!

I'm generous that way.

Happy birthday!

You must be getting towards "OF" (old fart) status!