Updated: Toolchain on Windows now use VisualStudio 2022 and new MSVCRT for faster PureBasic programs and easier external libs integration.
What are the consequences of this? Will applications compiled with the new version of PureBasic be able to run on each supported Windows version (Vista, 7 ...
Search found 8 matches
- Wed Jan 24, 2024 8:54 pm
- Forum: Announcement
- Topic: PureBasic 6.10 LTS is out !
- Replies: 344
- Views: 111169
- Mon Jun 19, 2023 4:02 pm
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Most up-to-date alternative UI libraryfor Windows
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1783
Re: Most up-to-date alternative UI libraryfor Windows
Thanks guys for your answers.
@firace: looks nice. Actually, I do not need a lot widgets. Just the following:
* Button
* Inout box (StringGadget)
* Checkbox
* Radio button
* Progressbar
Is your UI library DPI-aware and fully unicode-compliant? I would be glad to play around with your lib.
@firace: looks nice. Actually, I do not need a lot widgets. Just the following:
* Button
* Inout box (StringGadget)
* Checkbox
* Radio button
* Progressbar
Is your UI library DPI-aware and fully unicode-compliant? I would be glad to play around with your lib.
- Sun Jun 18, 2023 11:41 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Define Prototype for a function that returns a pointer
- Replies: 6
- Views: 700
Re: Define Prototype for a function that returns a pointer
I see your point. But on the other hand, it really decreases maintainability. Because as a consumer of the API, I expect really an integer when I see .i, not a pointer...
- Sun Jun 18, 2023 11:30 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Define Prototype for a function that returns a pointer
- Replies: 6
- Views: 700
Re: Define Prototype for a function that returns a pointer
Hello luis,
thanks for your post. But it seems like an odd language design that we use .i for a pointer....I do not know any compiled language supporting pointers which is designed like that. Why can't we explicitly define a pointer as the return value?
thanks for your post. But it seems like an odd language design that we use .i for a pointer....I do not know any compiled language supporting pointers which is designed like that. Why can't we explicitly define a pointer as the return value?
- Sun Jun 18, 2023 10:43 am
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Define Prototype for a function that returns a pointer
- Replies: 6
- Views: 700
Define Prototype for a function that returns a pointer
Hello folks,
I am currently writing an include file for a DLL developed C and there are several functions which return a Pointer. How can I define a Prototype for those?
I am currently writing an include file for a DLL developed C and there are several functions which return a Pointer. How can I define a Prototype for those?
- Sat Jun 17, 2023 8:08 pm
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Most up-to-date alternative UI libraryfor Windows
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1783
Re: Most up-to-date alternative UI libraryfor Windows
I see what you mean. But I would like to enforce the flat design in my application.
- Sat Jun 17, 2023 7:53 pm
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Most up-to-date alternative UI libraryfor Windows
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1783
Re: Most up-to-date alternative UI libraryfor Windows
What do you mean by that?
- Sat Jun 17, 2023 6:39 pm
- Forum: Coding Questions
- Topic: Most up-to-date alternative UI libraryfor Windows
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1783
Most up-to-date alternative UI libraryfor Windows
Hello folks,
I would like to have my Windows UI application appear in a "flat design", something like this: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eyb7Gla-ePo/maxresdefault.jpg
Are there any existing libraries for PureBasic allowing to create these kind of UI applications for Windows?
I would like to have my Windows UI application appear in a "flat design", something like this: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eyb7Gla-ePo/maxresdefault.jpg
Are there any existing libraries for PureBasic allowing to create these kind of UI applications for Windows?