PureBasic Forums - English

OK, that's what I thought. My workaround at the moment was to compile my DLL and then use "CFF Explorer" to manually change the Function name to reflect that of the decorated function.

Thanks again.

@Skywalk:
What do you mean by "not handled"?

To interoperate with another application I need to create a DLL that exports the described functionname. I cannot change the name and I don't know how to export decorated names with PureBasic, that's why I asked.

The calling convention is not really the problem. It could either be stdcall or cdecl.

My trouble is defining the function name to reflect the C++ representation to be able to decorate it accordingly.


ProcedureCDLL product::common::EnableProductSupport()
; perform some magic ...
EndProcedure

Hi all,

is it possible to export function in a PureBasic DLL with a decorated name?

In C++ you could export EnableProductSupport as:


C++: void __cdecl product::common::EnableProductSupport(void)
undecorated: ?EnableProductSupport@common@product@@YAXXZ


If I wanted to export that in my ...