PureBasic Forums - English

@rmk-soft
no, i use only MouseX/Y()

That makes sense.
Submit a bug report.
(Fred already told me about a problem with the mouse library on Linux.)
As for the compilation issues, I'll talk to him about it.

@PeDe
may be, flipbuffer don't work correctly
please run this code and give me the debug
InitSprite():InitMouse():InitKeyboard()
OpenWindow(0,0,0,800,600,"",#PB_Window_ScreenCentered)
OpenWindowedScreen(WindowID(0),0,0,800,600)
CreateSprite(0,128,128)
StartDrawing(SpriteOutput(0))
Circle(64,64,64 ...

@PeDe
- Regarding the mouse, I have the impression that FlipBuffers() does not wait for screen synchronization.
Can you measure the frame rate?
- Regarding compilation issues, I don't see any. The only “Linux” specificity concerns font size.
It may be a problem with lib creation.

to show normal:
Procedure debugnormal(mesh,color1.l,color2.l,lenth.f=1)
Protected i,j,ns,nv,mi,nmesh,nmat

nmesh=CreateMesh(-1,#PB_Mesh_LineList)
For j=0 To SubMeshCount(mesh)-1
nv=MeshVertexCount(mesh,j)-1
Dim v.MeshVertex(nv)
GetMeshData(mesh,j,v(),#PB_Mesh_Vertex|#PB_Mesh_Normal,0,nv ...

Even if the program is multithreaded, screengadget is not, and will always run on the main thread.

Event management is very basic at the moment.
This will be added in version 6.31.

it will be add for pb6.31

FYI
ScreenGadget uses basic PB functions:
- Vectordrawing only at initialization, to draw the interface
- 2DDrawing for updating gadgets' graphics
- Sprite, mouse, and keyboard on every frame

@PeDe
I think it's a Linux-specific bug.
Try this example:
InitSprite():InitMouse():InitKeyboard ...

@minimy
nothing !

@miso
no, but i implemented "ScreenMouseVisible" to show or hide mouse pointer

Yeah, that's new.
Now you have to specify “#PB_Sprite_Transparent”
and the default drawing mode set the alpha to 0.
I don't know why Fred did that.
:shock:

I think you can file a bug report.
That will at least clarify the issue.

InitSprite()

Debug OpenScreen(1600,900,32,"Sprite")

;Création ...

I read part of the thread.
My little tool:
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtopic.php?p=631988#p631988
was initially created specifically for managing optional parameters.

With the optimization of the C code, I think my management of optional parameters remains optimal.
(if anyone wants to do ...

To test :

[EDITED 11/04/2025]
- Resident management (thanks to ChrisR)
- “IncludeFile” management (which may contain “ProcedureDLL”)
- Modification by Fred for multi-platform (among other things)
- bug fix for the procedureDLL in comment

idle wrote: Thu Oct 30, 2025 3:14 am I will look into building nanovg next week so we can experiment with that as a backend, might calm pf shadoko down

See, it pays to yell!

As for image caching, it seems complicated to me, since animations can be interspersed between fixed layers.
But hey, you know your stuff...