PureBasic Forums - English

Not really installing, but extracting the different .exe & copying the necessary items into the necessary folders and finally adding them via preferences E.g.: D:\Tools\PureBasic_x64\App This one contains the normal x64 folder structure: Catalogs Compilers PureLibraries Residents SDK SubSystems ...

Would it be possible to sort compilers (e.g. first by version, then by bitness) in

Menu | Compiler | Compiler Options...
?

My list currently looks like this:
https://imgur.com/a/PzTOkcT

And you’ve checked the compiler settings of the current project you’re trying to compile?

@Inner

Don't know if you care or not, but on the github page you have two occurrences of the word "veriable".
Maybe you want to correct them to "variable"

Very helpful, thanks for sharing!

Very helpful, thanks (again) for sharing!

I know this thread is a bit older but I was just in the need to pick specific elements in a json hierarchy so: Thank you @the.weavster for the example code to do this!

@mk-soft

~23 ms for 100k rounds. Nice as well

Happy new year!

Afaik not possible. That's internal data of the regex engine, you can't start / resume a regex search from a different position.

What you can do is: If you got the position from the first match, split the string at that pos (-1) and start the search on the second part of the split

There is Just store these positions during the loop if you want to access them (later)?

@SMaag

Thanks for adding this to the discussion

I do not plan to test it for speed but it adds some additional value (so I've added it to the string functions I use)

Ok, thanks!

About 13ms for both variants (Create threadsafe executable / or not). No real difference

@mk-soft Two questions to fully understand what you're doing there: Default *result = @result You're setting the pointer back to the start of the string here? Let's say the demo string is: 25468test123 Then "25468" is already in the result The current char is now 't', the pointer is moved ...

@mk-soft

Wow!

At max 20ms, depending on the input string (and the size definition for the fixed string), down to 11 ms (e.g. if limited to 4)^^

@Marc56us The slightly optimised version takes about 75ms (again with 100k loops) Your last posted version takes about 85ms Procedure.s GetTrailingNumbersFromString6(string.s) Protected.i i, num Protected.s result For i = Len(string) To 1 Step -1 num = Asc(Mid(string, i, 1)) If num >= 48 And num <= ...