PureBasic Forums - English

Thank you!

You are right!!
I will investigate...

Thank you!

Hi


my definitions
Global pc.u, pc_.u, sp.u, mp.u, t.u, u.u, ff.u, ff_.u, fa.u, fa_.u, fb.u, fb_.u, fr.u, fr_.u

Macro ADC(b)
TstatesDelay(pc-1)
addst(4)
fa=a
fb=b
ff=(ff>>8&1)+fa+fb
a=ff
fr=a
_f3Updated = #True
EndMacro

Macro z80()
Select RByte((pc-1)&$FFFF) ; RByte = read byte ...

infratec, thank you. Unfortunately stil fail...

Hm... maybe you need an additional brace, C has party a different order fr executing.


Yes , the order of executing (operators priorities) cause me a lot the problem while converting this code years ago:

https://github.com/antoniovillena/ticks ...

I need to convert 2 lines of C code
#1

fr= a= (ff= (fa= a)+(fb= b)+(ff>>8&1)) ; //C code

fa=a
fb=b
ff=(ff>>8&1)+fa+fb
a=ff
fr=a


#2

fr= a= (ff= (fa= a)+(fb= ~b)+(ff>>8&1^1)) ;// C code

fb=~b
fa=a
ff=fa+fb+((ff>>8&1)!1)
a=ff
fr=a


The 2 lines above are part of Z80 instructions ...

What help me in my program is repeat the line:

@JHPJHP yes, the new version works fine.
Thanks for sharing!

@breeze4me thanks, now works here.

@JHPJHP very nice code!
Thank you!

-Cobra
-R Type
(ZX Spectrum)

Thank you for X86 update!

HI
Maybe this version ?
https://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewto ... as#p350338

Not use UPX for years, but did a test.

VirusTotal results:

PB 6.0 (x86)
without UPX: 4/70
with UPX: 8/70


PB 6.1 (x86)
without UPX: 6/70
with UPX: 11/70

Thank you!

PB 6.0 x86 C optimized : 3270
PB 6.1 B9 x86 C optimized : 3420

My emulator at full speed with PB 6.0 runs about +20 frames/sec compared with PB 6.1

Hi
Just to report that with beta 9 OpenLibrary() works again with wd1793.dll (both files).
The initial problem with beta 1 was solved.