[Implemented] While im at it, how about Undefine ?

Got an idea for enhancing PureBasic? New command(s) you'd like to see?
technicorn
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:40 pm
Location: Hamburg

[Implemented] While im at it, how about Undefine ?

Post by technicorn »

I know this is a lot to ask for, but any chance for a Undefine, at least for Macros ?

I don't know if the PB compiler is a one pass compiler or not,
as for a one pass compiler this feature would be easyer to implement,
than for a multy pass compiler I think.

Greatings
Technicorn
User avatar
luis
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3893
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:09 pm
Location: Italy

Re: While im at it, how about Undefine ?

Post by luis »

technicorn wrote: I don't know if the PB compiler is a one pass compiler or not,
When a compiler requires declare statements for forward referenced procedures, you can bet it's a single pass compiler :-)

undefine for #constants would be nice.
Post Reply