Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
Dude
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:49 pm

Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by Dude »

My Firefox just updated itself to the new version called FireFox Quantum, and the speed is incredible! Even browsing these PureBasic forums is so much faster and immediate. Very happy!

My usual browsing with Firefox showed pages where you'd see each element loading and the page building up bit-by-bit, but now they pretty much just appear instantly in one go. I wonder what they did to gain such speed?

Seriously, if you're using Firefox and haven't upgraded to it, do it NOW! :shock: :D

https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2017/11/1 ... x-quantum/
User avatar
J. Baker
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:12 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by J. Baker »

I'm glad you see improvement but it's slower here. Now when I launch Firefox, it takes like 3-4 seconds longer to load my home page, which is duckduckgo.com. Any page I open, it takes seconds longer. I don't have many plugins but 2 of them no longer work in the newer version, so I'm even loading less plugins than before. The older version was much faster here. I haven't tried any HTML5 games for a speed comparison yet.

On a side note. Even youtube's new layout is slower. Much slower. Maybe these speed increases use special cpu instructions that my cpu doesn't offer?
www.posemotion.com

PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef

Mac: 10.13.6 / 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo / 2GB DDR3 / Nvidia 320M
PC: Win 7 / AMD 64 4000+ / 3GB DDR / Nvidia 720GT


Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
User avatar
J. Baker
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:12 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by J. Baker »

I just did the following test. Comparing Firefox 58.0 vs Safari 9.1.3 vs Chrome 63.0.3239.132. I didn't copy all the data in order to save a lengthy post but an old version of Safari wins hands down.
https://webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html

Firefox

Code: Select all

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                  832.4ms +/- 12.7%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                   122.9ms +/- 4.0%
    cube:                57.3ms +/- 5.3%
    morph:               20.6ms +/- 11.8%
    raytrace:            45.0ms +/- 3.7%
Chrome

Code: Select all

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                 1050.1ms +/- 2.7%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                   182.8ms +/- 4.5%
    cube:                52.2ms +/- 7.6%
    morph:               40.9ms +/- 12.7%
    raytrace:            89.7ms +/- 7.8%
Safari 32 bit mode

Code: Select all

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                  463.4ms +/- 4.8%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                    70.1ms +/- 24.3%
    cube:                16.3ms +/- 2.1%
    morph:               23.5ms +/- 10.8%
    raytrace:            30.3ms +/- 50.6%
Safari 64 bit mode

Code: Select all

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                  451.4ms +/- 2.1%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                    57.4ms +/- 1.6%
    cube:                16.2ms +/- 1.9%
    morph:               20.3ms +/- 1.7%
    raytrace:            20.9ms +/- 4.1%
www.posemotion.com

PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef

Mac: 10.13.6 / 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo / 2GB DDR3 / Nvidia 320M
PC: Win 7 / AMD 64 4000+ / 3GB DDR / Nvidia 720GT


Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
wilbert
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 3870
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 5:21 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by wilbert »

J. Baker wrote:I just did the following test. Comparing Firefox 58.0 vs Safari 9.1.3 vs Chrome 63.0.3239.132. I didn't copy all the data in order to save a lengthy post but an old version of Safari wins hands down.
https://webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html
The SunSpider website mentions that SunSpider is no longer maintained and recommends JetStream http://browserbench.org/JetStream/
With SunSpider, on my computer also Safari comes out best but with JetStream, Firefox does.
Page loading time however feels very fast with Firefox.
Windows (x64)
Raspberry Pi OS (Arm64)
User avatar
J. Baker
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:12 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by J. Baker »

wilbert wrote: The SunSpider website mentions that SunSpider is no longer maintained and recommends JetStream http://browserbench.org/JetStream/
Just did the JetStream test with Safari and Firefox. Firefox does show most of the test now beating Safari but not all. In real world, so to speak, Safari loads Amazon, Facebook, Youtube, my homepage, etc. much faster than Firefox. To me, the SunSpider was a much more accurate result. When I used the SunSpider test, Safari floated right through it and Firefox took a bit longer to run the test. Now when I used JetStream, the test seemed to run at about the same speed. I don't understand why Firefox is getting better scores with JetStream?
www.posemotion.com

PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef

Mac: 10.13.6 / 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo / 2GB DDR3 / Nvidia 320M
PC: Win 7 / AMD 64 4000+ / 3GB DDR / Nvidia 720GT


Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
User avatar
J. Baker
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:12 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by J. Baker »

Ok. I found another test and this is where Firefox shines over Safari. At least on my system.
https://codepen.io/perbyhring/pen/LLVYKz

It appears to me, Firefox did make improvements when rendering on a canvas and so forth. But in "real world use", Safari loads webpages and all the content that comes with that much faster for everyday use. I think that speed increase for Firefox comes with some kind of pre-buffering or something and maybe that's why I see on my 1.4Ghz 2GB system it takes a hit when loading. Now after loading, there may be an increase in performance like I saw in the particle link I just posted above. If you have a faster system than I have, you may not notice this load delay.

So I would say. Firefox is not a faster browser but has a faster rendering engine. Once all is loaded, you can see its benefits.
www.posemotion.com

PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef

Mac: 10.13.6 / 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo / 2GB DDR3 / Nvidia 320M
PC: Win 7 / AMD 64 4000+ / 3GB DDR / Nvidia 720GT


Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
RASHAD
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 4635
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:27 am

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by RASHAD »

FireFox Quantum is using multitask multi threading Tech.
Open the Task manager you will see that at least 5 Services are opened all together at the same time
So the speed will depend on the design of the URL opened
I like firefox for keeping the preferences for each URL
So you do not need to adjust the view each time
Unless it is there for Safari :wink:
Egypt my love
Dude
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:49 pm

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by Dude »

J. Baker wrote:I'm glad you see improvement but it's slower here.
Really? It's like going from dialup to broadband for me. I'm amazed by the difference with every website I visit.
User avatar
Samuel
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 755
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:33 pm
Location: United States

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by Samuel »

About time, firefox was a bit late to the party for multi core support.

@J.Baker
Have you tried opera? I switched to it from firefox about a half year ago and have been very happy with it. It even comes with a built in ad blocker and free vpn.
User avatar
J. Baker
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:12 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by J. Baker »

Samuel wrote:@J.Baker
Have you tried opera? I switched to it from firefox about a half year ago and have been very happy with it. It even comes with a built in ad blocker and free vpn.
It's been a while but will give it a try. ;)
www.posemotion.com

PureBasic Tools for OS X: PureMonitor, plist Tool, Data Maker & App Chef

Mac: 10.13.6 / 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo / 2GB DDR3 / Nvidia 320M
PC: Win 7 / AMD 64 4000+ / 3GB DDR / Nvidia 720GT


Even the vine knows it surroundings but the man with eyes does not.
User avatar
Fangbeast
PureBasic Protozoa
PureBasic Protozoa
Posts: 4747
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 3:08 pm
Location: Not Sydney!!! (Bad water, no goats)

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by Fangbeast »

From the paranoid side of the world, try Vivaldi as well. It's an offshoot of Opera without the security connotations.

People can read whatever the hell they want into that statement, I don't give a shit, but I am not using Opera.
Amateur Radio, D-STAR/VK3HAF
User avatar
Shield
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1021
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:25 am
Location: 'stralia!
Contact:

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by Shield »

AFAIK, the reason why the new Firefox feels faster hasn't much to do with JavaScript performance but more
with its CSS rendering engine that's now multi-threaded (thanks to the Servo project and the Rust programming language).
Browser vendors tried to parallelize this before but failed (Mozilla failed twice) and only succeeded with Rust.
Fangbeast wrote:[...]I don't give a shit, but I am not using Opera.
:lol:

I'm using Vivaldi as well, simply because it's the browser that does exactly what I need it to do,
basically replacing the old version of Opera before it became a bad Chrome clone.
Image
Blog: Why Does It Suck? (http://whydoesitsuck.com/)
"You can disagree with me as much as you want, but during this talk, by definition, anybody who disagrees is stupid and ugly."
- Linus Torvalds
User avatar
Kurzer
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:07 am
Location: Near Hamburg

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by Kurzer »

Fangbeast wrote:From the paranoid side of the world, try Vivaldi as well. It's an offshoot of Opera without the security connotations.
Fangbeast., thank you for letting me know about this browser. I am currently using Iron (a chrome clone without the google spy technology), but vivaldi looks promising, especially as it is portable and seemingly compatible with chrome extensions. Image

PS: It seems the Vivaldi "standalone installation" is not really portable. Vivaldi will still use the registry in this mode. :-(
PB 6.02 x64, OS: Win 7 Pro x64 & Win 11 x64, Desktopscaling: 125%, CPU: I7 6500, RAM: 16 GB, GPU: Intel Graphics HD 520, User age in 2023: 56y
"Happiness is a pet." | "Never run a changing system!"
User avatar
Fangbeast
PureBasic Protozoa
PureBasic Protozoa
Posts: 4747
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 3:08 pm
Location: Not Sydney!!! (Bad water, no goats)

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by Fangbeast »

It seems the Vivaldi "standalone installation" is not really portable. Vivaldi will still use the registry in this mode.
Bugger!! I didn't know that. We must send a message to them that this is not right, portable should mean exactly that. I think they are approacheable.
Amateur Radio, D-STAR/VK3HAF
User avatar
Kurzer
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:07 am
Location: Near Hamburg

Re: Firefox Quantum - oh, the speed!

Post by Kurzer »

They already know that, but so far they have seen no reason to implement it correctly.

You can find portable (virtualized) versions of vivaldi on the world wide web, but this is not a solution for me, because the browser will no longer run natively in the system.
PB 6.02 x64, OS: Win 7 Pro x64 & Win 11 x64, Desktopscaling: 125%, CPU: I7 6500, RAM: 16 GB, GPU: Intel Graphics HD 520, User age in 2023: 56y
"Happiness is a pet." | "Never run a changing system!"
Post Reply