I know that, maybe you already shown me in another thread. But for me, the #PB_Any does not need such and I also do not have to care about in any case. No need for common constants etc.
But hey, this is just my opinion. Everybody has to decide for himself. And luckily, PB allows both
What is the best way to use gadget ID's ?
Re: What is the best way to use gadget ID's ?
@T4r4ntul4,
what's the reason for you to use 2000+ Gadgets?
Are these all individual Gadgets or do you e.g. create a kind of List where you use Gadgets for each entry of the List?
If so, you could use fixed IDs for your individual Gadgets and use #PB_Any for the Gadgets, you use to generate the List.
Then you can store these IDs in a NewList(), which should make the handling much easier.
what's the reason for you to use 2000+ Gadgets?
Are these all individual Gadgets or do you e.g. create a kind of List where you use Gadgets for each entry of the List?
If so, you could use fixed IDs for your individual Gadgets and use #PB_Any for the Gadgets, you use to generate the List.
Then you can store these IDs in a NewList(), which should make the handling much easier.
[Dynamic-Dialogs] - create complex GUIs the easy way
[DeFlicker] - easily deflicker your resizeable Windows
[WinFX] - Window Effects (incl. 'click-through' Window)
[DeFlicker] - easily deflicker your resizeable Windows
[WinFX] - Window Effects (incl. 'click-through' Window)
Re: What is the best way to use gadget ID's ?
The reason is that its actually 8 programs in 1. Its administration software, so he has now 1 software package, to do all his administration needs. Thats why it has so many gadgets. its only 250 gadgets per program, if you look at it that way (some have more, some have less gadgets).PureLust wrote:@T4r4ntul4,
what's the reason for you to use 2000+ Gadgets?